and others warp it a little to their own, turn of
mind, or private views. A man who has been concerned
in a transaction will not write it fairly; and a man
who has not, cannot. But notwithstanding all this
uncertainty, history is not the less necessary to
be known, as the best histories are taken for granted,
and are the frequent subjects both of conversation
and writing. Though I am convinced that Caesar’s
ghost never appeared to Brutus, yet I should be much
ashamed to be ignorant of that fact, as related by
the historians of those times. Thus the Pagan
theology is universally received as matter for writing
and conversation, though believed now by nobody; and
we talk of Jupiter, Mars, Apollo, etc., as gods,
though we know, that if they ever existed at all,
it was only as mere mortal men. This historical
Pyrrhonism, then, proves nothing against the study
and knowledge of history; which, of all other studies,
is the most necessary for a man who is to live in
the world. It only points out to us, not to be
too decisive and peremptory; and to be cautious how
we draw inferences for our own practice from remote
facts, partially or ignorantly related; of which we
can, at best, but imperfectly guess, and certainly
not know the real motives. The testimonies of
ancient history must necessarily be weaker than those
of modern, as all testimony grows weaker and weaker,
as it is more and more remote from us. I would
therefore advise you to study ancient history, in
general, as other people, do; that is, not to be ignorant
of any or those facts which are universally received,
upon the faith of the best historians; and whether
true or false, you have them as other people have
them. But modern history, I mean particularly
that of the last three centuries, is what I would
have you apply to with the greatest attention and
exactness. There the probability of coming at
the truth is much greater, as the testimonies are
much more recent; besides, anecdotes, memoirs, and
original letters, often come to the aid of modern
history. The best memoirs that I know of are those
of Cardinal de Retz, which I have once before recommended
to you; and which I advise you to read more than once,
with attention. There are many political maxims
in these memoirs, most of which are printed in italics;
pray attend to, and remember them. I never read
them but my own experience confirms the truth of them.
Many of them seem trifling to people who are not used
to business; but those who are, feel the truth of
them.
It is time to put an end to this long rambling letter; in which if any one thing can be of use to you, it will more than pay the trouble I have taken to write it. Adieu! Yours.
LETTER XXXVIII
London, May 10, O. S. 1748.