General Carl Schurz.

My dear sir—­I have just received and read your letter of the 20th.  The purport of it is that we lost the late elections and the administration is failing because the war is unsuccessful, and that I must not flatter myself that I am not justly to blame for it.  I certainly know that if the war fails the administration fails, and that I will be blamed for it, whether I deserve it or not.  And I ought to be blamed if I could do better.  You think I could do better; therefore you blame me already.  I think I could not do better; therefore I blame you for blaming me.  I understand you now to be willing to accept the help of men who are not Republicans, provided they have “heart in it.”  Agreed.  I want no others.  But who is to be the judge of hearts, or of “heart in it”?  If I must discard my own judgment and take yours, I must also take that of others and by the time I should reject all I should be advised to reject, I should have none left, Republicans or others not even yourself.  For be assured, my dear sir, there are men who have “heart in it” that think you are performing your part as poorly as you think I am performing mine.  I certainly have been dissatisfied with the slowness of Buell and McClellan; but before I relieved them I had great fears I should not find successors to them who would do better; and I am sorry to add that I have seen little since to relieve those fears.

I do not see clearly the prospect of any more rapid movements.  I fear we shall at last find out that the difficulty is in our case rather than in particular generals.  I wish to disparage no one certainly not those who sympathize with me; but I must say I need success more than I need sympathy, and that I have not seen the so much greater evidence of getting success from my sympathizers than from those who are denounced as the contrary.  It does seem to me that in the field the two classes have been very much alike in what they have done and what they have failed to do.  In sealing their faith with their blood, Baker and Lyon and Bohien and Richardson, Republicans, did all that men could do; but did they any more than Kearny and Stevens and Reno and Mansfield, none of whom were Republicans, and some at least of whom have been bitterly and repeatedly denounced to me as secession sympathizers?  I will not perform the ungrateful task of comparing cases of failure.

In answer to your question, “Has it not been publicly stated in the newspapers, and apparently proved as a fact, that from the commencement of the war the enemy was continually supplied with information by some of the confidential subordinates of as important an officer as Adjutant-General Thomas?” I must say “No,” as far as my knowledge extends.  And I add that if you can give any tangible evidence upon the subject, I will thank you to come to this city and do so.

Very truly your friend,

A. Lincoln.