On this subject of treating it as a wrong, and limiting its spread, let me say a word.  Has anything ever threatened the existence of this Union save and except this very institution of slavery?  What is it that we hold most dear amongst us?  Our own liberty and prosperity.  What has ever threatened our liberty and prosperity, save and except this institution of slavery?  If this is true, how do you propose to improve the condition of things by enlarging slavery, by spreading it out and making it bigger?  You may have a wen or cancer upon your person, and not be able to cut it out, lest you bleed to death; but surely it is no way to cure it, to engraft it and spread it over your whole body.  That is no proper way of treating what you regard a wrong.  You see this peaceful way of dealing with it as a wrong, restricting the spread of it, and not allowing it to go into new countries where it has not already existed.  That is the peaceful way, the old-fashioned way, the way in which the fathers themselves set us the example.

On the other hand, I have said there is a sentiment which treats it as not being wrong.  That is the Democratic sentiment of this day.  I do not mean to say that every man who stands within that range positively asserts that it is right.  That class will include all who positively assert that it is right, and all who, like Judge Douglas, treat it as indifferent and do not say it is either right or wrong.  These two classes of men fall within the general class of those who do not look upon it as a wrong.  And if there be among you anybody who supposes that he, as a Democrat, can consider himself “as much opposed to slavery as anybody,” I would like to reason with him.  You never treat it as a wrong.  What other thing that you consider as a wrong do you deal with as you deal with that?  Perhaps you say it is wrong—­but your leader never does, and you quarrel with anybody who says it is wrong.  Although you pretend to say so yourself, you can find no fit place to deal with it as a wrong.  You must not say anything about it in the free States, because it is not here.  You must not say anything about it in the slave States, because it is there.  You must not say anything about it in the pulpit, because that is religion, and has nothing to do with it.  You must not say anything about it in politics, because that will disturb the security of “my place.”  There is no place to talk about it as being a wrong, although you say yourself it is a wrong.  But, finally, you will screw yourself up to the belief that if the people of the slave States should adopt a system of gradual emancipation on the slavery question, you would be in favor of it.  You would be in favor of it.  You say that is getting it in the right place, and you would be glad to see it succeed.  But you are deceiving yourself.  You all know that Frank Blair and Gratz Brown, down there in St. Louis, undertook to introduce that system in Missouri.  They fought as valiantly as they could for the system