of slavery had passed from among us,—­there should be nothing on the face of the great charter of liberty suggesting that such a thing as negro slavery had ever existed among us.  This is part of the evidence that the fathers of the government expected and intended the institution of slavery to come to an end.  They expected and intended that it should be in the course of ultimate extinction.  And when I say that I desire to see the further spread of it arrested, I only say I desire to see that done which the fathers have first done.  When I say I desire to see it placed where the public mind will rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction, I only say I desire to see it placed where they placed it.  It is not true that our fathers, as Judge Douglas assumes, made this government part slave and part free.  Understand the sense in which he puts it.  He assumes that slavery is a rightful thing within itself,—­was introduced by the framers of the Constitution.  The exact truth is, that they found the institution existing among us, and they left it as they found it.  But in making the government they left this institution with many clear marks of disapprobation upon it.  They found slavery among them, and they left it among them because of the difficulty—­the absolute impossibility—­of its immediate removal.  And when Judge Douglas asks me why we cannot let it remain part slave and part free, as the fathers of the government made it, he asks a question based upon an assumption which is itself a falsehood; and I turn upon him and ask him the question, when the policy that the fathers of the government had adopted in relation to this element among us was the best policy in the world, the only wise policy, the only policy that we can ever safely continue upon that will ever give us peace, unless this dangerous element masters us all and becomes a national institution,—­I turn upon him and ask him why he could not leave it alone.  I turn and ask him why he was driven to the necessity of introducing a new policy in regard to it.  He has himself said he introduced a new policy.  He said so in his speech on the 22d of March of the present year, 1858.  I ask him why he could not let it remain where our fathers placed it.  I ask, too, of Judge Douglas and his friends why we shall not again place this institution upon the basis on which the fathers left it.  I ask you, when he infers that I am in favor of setting the free and slave States at war, when the institution was placed in that attitude by those who made the Constitution, did they make any war?  If we had no war out of it when thus placed, wherein is the ground of belief that we shall have war out of it if we return to that policy?  Have we had any peace upon this matter springing from any other basis?  I maintain that we have not.  I have proposed nothing more than a return to the policy of the fathers.