But there is a point that I wish, before leaving this part of the discussion, to ask attention to.  I have read and I repeat the words of Henry Clay: 

“I desire no concealment of my opinions in regard to the institution of slavery.  I look upon it as a great evil, and deeply lament that we have derived it from the parental government and from our ancestors.  I wish every slave in the United States was in the country of his ancestors.  But here they are, and the question is, How can they be best dealt with?  If a state of nature existed, and we were about to lay the foundations of society, no man would be more strongly opposed than I should be to incorporate the institution of slavery amongst its elements.”

The principle upon which I have insisted in this canvass is in relation to laying the foundations of new societies.  I have never sought to apply these principles to the old States for the purpose of abolishing slavery in those States.  It is nothing but a miserable perversion of what I have said, to assume that I have declared Missouri, or any other slave State, shall emancipate her slaves; I have proposed no such thing.  But when Mr. Clay says that in laying the foundations of society in our Territories where it does not exist, he would be opposed to the introduction of slavery as an element, I insist that we have his warrant—­his license—­for insisting upon the exclusion of that element which he declared in such strong and emphatic language was most hurtful to him.

Judge Douglas has again referred to a Springfield speech in which I said “a house divided against itself cannot stand.”  The Judge has so often made the entire quotation from that speech that I can make it from memory.  I used this language: 

“We are now far into the fifth year since a policy was initiated with the avowed object and confident promise of putting an end to the slavery agitation.  Under the operation of this policy, that agitation has not only not ceased, but has constantly augmented.  In my opinion it will not cease until a crisis shall have been reached and passed.  ’A house divided against itself cannot stand.’  I believe this government cannot endure permanently, half slave and half free.  I do not expect the house to fall, but I do expect it will cease to be divided.  It will become all one thing, or all the other.  Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction, or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new, North as well as South.”

That extract and the sentiments expressed in it have been extremely offensive to Judge Douglas.  He has warred upon them as Satan wars upon the Bible.  His perversions upon it are endless.  Here now are my views upon it in brief: