sentiment, which will tolerate no idea of preventing the wrong from growing larger, and looks to there never being an end to it through all the existence of things,—­arises the real difference between Judge Douglas and his friends on the one hand and the Republicans on the other.  Now, I confess myself as belonging to that class in the country who contemplate slavery as a moral, social, and political evil, having due regard for its actual existence amongst us and the difficulties of getting rid of it in any satisfactory way, and to all the constitutional obligations which have been thrown about it; but, nevertheless, desire a policy that looks to the prevention of it as a wrong, and looks hopefully to the time when as a wrong it may come to an end.

Judge Douglas has again, for, I believe, the fifth time, if not the seventh, in my presence, reiterated his charge of a conspiracy or combination between the National Democrats and Republicans.  What evidence Judge Douglas has upon this subject I know not, inasmuch as he never favors us with any.  I have said upon a former occasion, and I do not choose to suppress it now, that I have no objection to the division in the Judge’s party.  He got it up himself.  It was all his and their work.  He had, I think, a great deal more to do with the steps that led to the Lecompton Constitution than Mr. Buchanan had; though at last, when they reached it, they quarreled over it, and their friends divided upon it.  I am very free to confess to Judge Douglas that I have no objection to the division; but I defy the Judge to show any evidence that I have in any way promoted that division, unless he insists on being a witness himself in merely saying so.  I can give all fair friends of Judge Douglas here to understand exactly the view that Republicans take in regard to that division.  Don’t you remember how two years ago the opponents of the Democratic party were divided between Fremont and Fillmore?  I guess you do.  Any Democrat who remembers that division will remember also that he was at the time very glad of it, and then he will be able to see all there is between the National Democrats and the Republicans.  What we now think of the two divisions of Democrats, you then thought of the Fremont and Fillmore divisions.  That is all there is of it.

But if the Judge continues to put forward the declaration that there is an unholy and unnatural alliance between the Republicans and the National Democrats, I now want to enter my protest against receiving him as an entirely competent witness upon that subject.  I want to call to the Judge’s attention an attack he made upon me in the first one of these debates, at Ottawa, on the 21st of August.  In order to fix extreme Abolitionism upon me, Judge Douglas read a set of resolutions which he declared had been passed by a Republican State Convention, in October, 1854, at Springfield, Illinois, and he declared I had taken part in that Convention.  It turned out that although