my speeches north and south. While I am here
perhaps I ought to say a word, if I have the time,
in regard to the latter portion of the Judge’s
speech, which was a sort of declamation in reference
to my having said I entertained the belief that this
government would not endure half slave and half free.
I have said so, and I did not say it without what
seemed to me to be good reasons. It perhaps would
require more time than I have now to set forth these
reasons in detail; but let me ask you a few questions.
Have we ever had any peace on this slavery question?
When are we to have peace upon it, if it is kept in
the position it now occupies? How are we ever
to have peace upon it? That is an important question.
To be sure, if we will all stop, and allow Judge Douglas
and his friends to march on in their present career
until they plant the institution all over the nation,
here and wherever else our flag waves, and we acquiesce
in it, there will be peace. But let me ask Judge
Douglas how he is going to get the people to do that?
They have been wrangling over this question for at
least forty years. This was the cause of the
agitation resulting in the Missouri Compromise; this
produced the troubles at the annexation of Texas, in
the acquisition of the territory acquired in the Mexican
War. Again, this was the trouble which was quieted
by the Compromise of 1850, when it was settled “forever”
as both the great political parties declared in their
National Conventions. That “forever”
turned out to be just four years, when Judge Douglas
himself reopened it. When is it likely to come
to an end? He introduced the Nebraska Bill in
1854 to put another end to the slavery agitation.
He promised that it would finish it all up immediately,
and he has never made a speech since, until he got
into a quarrel with the President about the Lecompton
Constitution, in which he has not declared that we
are just at the end of the slavery agitation.
But in one speech, I think last winter, he did say
that he did n’t quite see when the end of the
slavery agitation would come. Now he tells us
again that it is all over and the people of Kansas
have voted down the Lecompton Constitution. How
is it over? That was only one of the attempts
at putting an end to the slavery agitation—one
of these “final settlements.” Is
Kansas in the Union? Has she formed a constitution
that she is likely to come in under? Is not the
slavery agitation still an open question in that Territory?
Has the voting down of that constitution put an end
to all the trouble? Is that more likely to settle
it than every one of these previous attempts to settle
the slavery agitation? Now, at this day in the
history of the world we can no more foretell where
the end of this slavery agitation will be than we can
see the end of the world itself. The Nebraska-Kansas
Bill was introduced four years and a half ago, and
if the agitation is ever to come to an end we may say
we are four years and a half nearer the end. So,