defeated was to be forgotten; but with him defeat was but a trifling incident, neither changing him nor the world’s estimate of him.  Even those of both political parties who have been preferred to him for the highest office have run far briefer courses than he, and left him still shining high in the heavens of the political world.  Jackson, Van Buren, Harnson, Polk, and Taylor all rose after, and set long before him.  The spell—­the long-enduring spell—­with which the souls of men were bound to him is a miracle.  Who can compass it?  It is probably true he owed his pre-eminence to no one quality, but to a fortunate combination of several.  He was surpassingly eloquent; but many eloquent men fail utterly, and they are not, as a class, generally successful.  His judgment was excellent; but many men of good judgment live and die unnoticed.  His will was indomitable; but this quality often secures to its owner nothing better than a character for useless obstinacy.  These, then, were Mr. Clay’s leading qualities.  No one of them is very uncommon; but all together are rarely combined in a single individual, and this is probably the reason why such men as Henry Clay are so rare in the world.

Mr. Clay’s eloquence did not consist, as many fine specimens of eloquence do, of types and figures, of antithesis and elegant arrangement of words and sentences, but rather of that deeply earnest and impassioned tone and manner which can proceed only from great sincerity, and a thorough conviction in the speaker of the justice and importance of his cause.  This it is that truly touches the chords of sympathy; and those who heard Mr. Clay never failed to be moved by it, or ever afterward forgot the impression.  All his efforts were made for practical effect.  He never spoke merely to be heard.  He never delivered a Fourth of July oration, or a eulogy on an occasion like this.  As a politician or statesman, no one was so habitually careful to avoid all sectional ground.  Whatever he did he did for the whole country.  In the construction of his measures, he ever carefully surveyed every part of the field, and duly weighed every conflicting interest.  Feeling as he did, and as the truth surely is, that the world’s best hope depended on the continued union of these States, he was ever jealous of and watchful for whatever might have the slightest tendency to separate them.

Mr. Clay’s predominant sentiment, from first to last, was a deep devotion to the cause of human liberty—­a strong sympathy with the oppressed everywhere, and an ardent wish for their elevation.  With him this was a primary and all-controlling passion.  Subsidiary to this was the conduct of his whole life.  He loved his country partly because it was his own country, and mostly because it was a free country; and he burned with a zeal for its advancement, prosperity, and glory, because he saw in such the advancement, prosperity, and glory of human liberty, human right, and human nature.  He desired the prosperity of his countrymen, partly because they were his countrymen, but chiefly to show to the world that free men could be prosperous.