navy stood ready, but was not in reach to take active part.  By these recent successes, the reinauguration of the national authority—­reconstruction which has had a large share of thought from the first, is pressed much more closely upon our attention.  It is fraught with great difficulty.  Unlike a case of war between independent nations, there is no authorized organ for us to treat with—­no one man has authority to give up the rebellion for any other man.  We simply must begin with and mould from disorganized and discordant elements.  Nor is it a small additional embarrassment that we, the loyal people, differ among ourselves as to the mode, manner, and measure of reconstruction.  As a general rule, I abstain from reading the reports of attacks upon myself, Wishing not to be provoked by that to which I cannot properly offer an answer.  In spite of this precaution, however, it comes to my knowledge that I am much censured for some supposed agency in setting up and seeking to sustain the new State government of Louisiana.  In this I have done just so much and no more than the public knows.  In the Annual Message of December, 1863, and the accompanying proclamation, I presented a plan of reconstruction, as the phrase goes, which I promised, if adopted by any State, would be acceptable to and sustained by the Executive Government of the nation.  I distinctly stated that this was not the only plan that might possibly be acceptable, and I also distinctly protested that the Executive claimed no right to say when or whether members should be admitted to seats in Congress from such States.  This plan was in advance submitted to the then Cabinet, and approved by every member of it.  One of them suggested that I should then and in that connection apply the Emancipation Proclamation to the theretofore excepted parts of Virginia and Louisiana; that I should drop the suggestion about apprenticeship for freed people, and that I should omit the protest against my own power in regard to the admission of members of Congress.  But even he approved every part and parcel of the plan which has since been employed or touched by the action of Louisiana.  The new constitution of Louisiana, declaring emancipation for the whole State, practically applies the proclamation to the part previously excepted.  It does not adopt apprenticeship for freed people, and is silent, as it could not well be otherwise, about the admission of members to Congress.  So that, as it applied to Louisiana, every member of the Cabinet fully approved the plan.  The message went to Congress, and I received many commendations of the plan, written and verbal, and not a single objection to it from any professed emancipationist came to my knowledge until after the news reached Washington that the people of Louisiana had begun to move in accordance with it.  From about July, 1862, I had corresponded with different persons supposed to be interested in seeking a reconstruction of a State government for Louisiana.  When the message of