In an unpublished manuscript kindly submitted to me by Mr. Frothingham, Emerson is reported as saying, “God has given me the seeing eye, but not the working hand.”  His gift was insight:  he saw the germ through its envelop; the particular in the light of the universal; the fact in connection with the principle; the phenomenon as related to the law; all this not by the slow and sure process of science, but by the sudden and searching flashes of imaginative double vision.  He had neither the patience nor the method of the inductive reasoner; he passed from one thought to another not by logical steps but by airy flights, which left no footprints.  This mode of intellectual action when found united with natural sagacity becomes poetry, philosophy, wisdom, or prophecy in its various forms of manifestation.  Without that gift of natural sagacity (odoratio quaedam venatica),—­a good scent for truth and beauty,—­it appears as extravagance, whimsicality, eccentricity, or insanity, according to its degree of aberration.  Emerson was eminently sane for an idealist.  He carried the same sagacity into the ideal world that Franklin showed in the affairs of common life.

He was constitutionally fastidious, and had to school himself to become able to put up with the terrible inflictions of uncongenial fellowships.  We must go to his poems to get at his weaknesses.  The clown of the first edition of “Monadnoc” “with heart of cat and eyes of bug,” disappears in the after-thought of the later version of the poem, but the eye that recognized him and the nature that recoiled from him were there still.  What must he not have endured from the persecutions of small-minded worshippers who fastened upon him for the interminable period between the incoming and the outgoing railroad train!  He was a model of patience and good temper.  We might have feared that he lacked the sensibility to make such intrusions and offences an annoyance.  But when Mr. Frothingham gratifies the public with those most interesting personal recollections which I have had the privilege of looking over, it will be seen that his equanimity, admirable as it was, was not incapable of being disturbed, and that on rare occasions he could give way to the feeling which showed itself of old in the doom pronounced on the barren fig-tree.

Of Emerson’s affections his home-life, and those tender poems in memory of his brothers and his son, give all the evidence that could be asked or wished for.  His friends were all who knew him, for none could be his enemy; and his simple graciousness of manner, with the sincerity apparent in every look and tone, hardly admitted indifference on the part of any who met him were it but for a single hour.  Even the little children knew and loved him, and babes in arms returned his angelic smile.  Of the friends who were longest and most intimately associated with him, it is needless to say much in this place.  Of those who are living, it is hardly time to speak;