It was at a banquet in London in honour of one of the two or three conspicuously illustrious English military names of this generation.  For reasons which will presently appear, I will withhold his real name and titles, and call him Lieutenant-General Lord Arthur Scoresby, V.C., K.C.B., etc., etc., etc.  What a fascination there is in a renowned name!  There say the man, in actual flesh, whom I had heard of so many thousands of times since that day, thirty years before, when his name shot suddenly to the zenith from a Crimean battle-field, to remain for ever celebrated.  It was food and drink to me to look, and look, and look at that demigod; scanning, searching, noting:  the quietness, the reserve, the noble gravity of his countenance; the simple honesty that expressed itself all over him; the sweet unconsciousness of his greatness—­unconsciousness of the hundreds of admiring eyes fastened upon him, unconsciousness of the deep, loving, sincere worship welling out of the breasts of those people and flowing toward him.

The clergyman at my left was an old acquaintance of mine—­clergyman now, but had spent the first half of his life in the camp and field, and as an instructor in the military school at Woolwich.  Just at the moment I have been talking about, a veiled and singular light glimmered in his eyes, and he leaned down and muttered confidentially to me—­indicating the hero of the banquet with a gesture,—­’Privately—­his glory is an accident —­just a product of incredible luck.’

This verdict was a great surprise to me.  If its subject had been Napoleon, or Socrates, or Solomon, my astonishment could not have been greater.

Some days later came the explanation of this strange remark, and this is what the Reverend told me.

About forty years ago I was an instructor in the military academy at Woolwich.  I was present in one of the sections when young Scoresby underwent his preliminary examination.  I was touched to the quick with pity; for the rest of the class answered up brightly and handsomely, while he—­why, dear me, he didn’t know anything, so to speak.  He was evidently good, and sweet, and lovable, and guileless; and so it was exceedingly painful to see him stand there, as serene as a graven image, and deliver himself of answers which were veritably miraculous for stupidity and ignorance.  All the compassion in me was aroused in his behalf.  I said to myself, when he comes to be examined again, he will be flung over, of course; so it will be simple a harmless act of charity to ease his fall as much as I can.

I took him aside, and found that he knew a little of Caesar’s history; and as he didn’t know anything else, I went to work and drilled him like a galley-slave on a certain line of stock questions concerning Caesar which I knew would be used.  If you’ll believe me, he went through with flying colours on examination day!  He went through on that purely superficial ‘cram’, and got compliments, too, while others, who knew a thousand times more than he, got plucked.  By some strangely lucky accident—­an accident not likely to happen twice in a century—­he was asked no question outside of the narrow limits of his drill.