all that thou hast; Give it to the poor;” and
“Follow me;” which are not Commands, but
Invitations, and Callings of men to Christianity,
like that of Esay 55.1. “Ho, every man that
thirsteth, come yee to the waters, come, and buy wine
and milke without money.” For first, the
Apostles power was no other than that of our Saviour,
to invite men to embrace the Kingdome of God; which
they themselves acknowledged for a Kingdome (not present,
but) to come; and they that have no Kingdome, can
make no Laws. And secondly, if their Acts of
Councell, were Laws, they could not without sin be
disobeyed. But we read not any where, that they
who received not the Doctrine of Christ, did therein
sin; but that they died in their sins; that is, that
their sins against the Laws to which they owed obedience,
were not pardoned. And those Laws were the Laws
of Nature, and the Civill Laws of the State, whereto
every Christian man had by pact submitted himself.
And therefore by the Burthen, which the Apostles
might lay on such as they had converted, are not to
be understood Laws, but Conditions, proposed to those
that sought Salvation; which they might accept, or
refuse at their own perill, without a new sin, though
not without the hazard of being condemned, and excluded
out of the Kingdome of God for their sins past.
And therefore of Infidels, S. John saith not, the
wrath of God shall “come” upon them, but
“the wrath of God remaineth upon them;”
and not that they shall be condemned; but that “they
are condemned already."(John 3.36, 3.18) Nor can it
be conceived, that the benefit of Faith, “is
Remission of sins” unlesse we conceive withall,
that the dammage of Infidelity, is “the Retention
of the same sins.”
But to what end is it (may some man aske), that the
Apostles, and other Pastors of the Church, after their
time, should meet together, to agree upon what Doctrine
should be taught, both for Faith and Manners, if no
man were obliged to observe their Decrees? To
this may be answered, that the Apostles, and Elders
of that Councell, were obliged even by their entrance
into it, to teach the Doctrine therein concluded,
and decreed to be taught, so far forth, as no precedent
Law, to which they were obliged to yeeld obedience,
was to the contrary; but not that all other Christians
should be obliged to observe, what they taught.
For though they might deliberate what each of them
should teach; yet they could not deliberate what others
should do, unless their Assembly had had a Legislative
Power; which none could have but Civill Soveraigns.
For though God be the Soveraign of all the world,
we are not bound to take for his Law, whatsoever is
propounded by every man in his name; nor any thing
contrary to the Civill Law, which God hath expressely
commanded us to obey.
Seeing then the Acts of Councell of the Apostles,
were then no Laws, but Councells; much lesse are Laws
the Acts of any other Doctors, or Councells since,
if assembled without the Authority of the Civill Soveraign.
And consequently, the Books of the New Testament,
though most perfect Rules of Christian Doctrine, could
not be made Laws by any other authority then that
of Kings, or Soveraign Assemblies.