To the editor op’ the sun:—­Sir,—­The newspaper atmosphere is charged with objections to New York as a place of sepulchre for General Grant, and the objectors are strenuous that Washington is the right place.  They offer good reasons—­good temporary reasons—­for both of these positions.

But it seems to me that temporary reasons are not mete for the occasion.  We need to consider posterity rather than our own generation.  We should select a grave which will not merely be in the right place now, but will still be in the right place 500 years from now.

How does Washington promise as to that?  You have only to hit it in one place to kill it.  Some day the west will be numerically strong enough to move the seat of government; her past attempts are a fair warning that when the day comes she will do it.  Then the city of Washington will lose its consequence and pass out of the public view and public talk.  It is quite within the possibilities that, a century hence, people would wonder and say, “How did your predecessors come to bury their great dead in this deserted place?”

But as long as American civilisation lasts New York will last.  I cannot but think she has been well and wisely chosen as the guardian of a grave which is destined to become almost the most conspicuous in the world’s history.  Twenty centuries from now New York will still be New York, still a vast city, and the most notable object in it will still be the tomb and monument of General Grant.

I observe that the common and strongest objection to New York is that she is not “national ground.”  Let us give ourselves no uneasiness about that.  Wherever General Grant’s body lies, that is national ground.

S. L. Clemens. 
Elmira, July 27.

The letter that follows is very long, but it seems too important and too interesting to be omitted in any part.  General Grant’s early indulgence in liquors had long been a matter of wide, though not very definite, knowledge.  Every one had heard how Lincoln, on being told that Grant drank, remarked something to the effect that he would like to know what kind of whisky Grant used so that he might get some of it for his other generals.  Henry Ward Beecher, selected to deliver a eulogy on the dead soldier, and doubtless wishing neither to ignore the matter nor to make too much of it, naturally turned for information to the publisher of Grant’s own memoirs, hoping from an advance copy to obtain light.

To Henry Ward Beecher,.Brooklyn: 

Elmira, N. Y. Sept. 11, ’85.  My dear Mr. Beecher,—­My nephew Webster is in Europe making contracts for the Memoirs.  Before he sailed he came to me with a writing, directed to the printers and binders, to this effect: 

“Honor no order for a sight or copy of the Memoirs while I am absent, even though it be signed by Mr. Clemens himself.”