Drink was served in pots, goblets, jugs, and bowls of silver in noblemen’s houses, and also in Venice glasses.  It was not set upon the table, but the cup was brought to each one who thirsted; he called for such a cup of drink as he wished, and delivered it again to one of the by-standers, who made it clean by pouring out what remained, and restored it to the sideboard.  This device was to prevent great drinking, which might ensue if the full pot stood always at the elbow.  But this order was not used in noblemen’s halls, nor in any order under the degree of knight or squire of great revenue.  It was a world to see how the nobles preferred to gold and silver, which abounded, the new Venice glass, whence a great trade sprang up with Murano that made many rich.  The poorest even would have glass, but home-made—­a foolish expense, for the glass soon went to bits, and the pieces turned to no profit.  Harrison wanted the philosopher’s stone to mix with this molten glass and toughen it.

There were multitudes of dependents fed at the great houses, and everywhere, according to means, a wide-open hospitality was maintained.  Froude gives a notion of the style of living in earlier times by citing the details of a feast given when George Neville, brother of Warwick the king-maker, was made archbishop of York.  There were present, including servants, thirty-five hundred persons.  These are a few of the things used at the banquet:  three hundred quarters of wheat, three hundred tuns of ale, one hundred and four tuns of wine, eighty oxen, three thousand geese, two thousand pigs,—­four thousand conies, four thousand heronshaws, four thousand venison pasties cold and five hundred hot, four thousand cold tarts, four thousand cold custards, eight seals, four porpoises, and so on.

The merchants and gentlemen kept much the same tables as the nobles, especially at feasts, but when alone were content with a few dishes.  They also desired the dearest food, and would have no meat from the butcher’s but the most delicate, while their list of fruits, cakes, Gates, and outlandish confections is as long as that at any modern banquet.  Wine ran in excess.  There were used fifty-six kinds of light wines, like the French, and thirty of the strong sorts, like the Italian and Eastern.  The stronger the wine, the better it was liked.  The strongest and best was in old times called theologicum, because it was had from the clergy and religious men, to whose houses the laity sent their bottles to be filled, sure that the religious would neither drink nor be served with the worst; for the merchant would have thought his soul should have gone straightway to the devil if he had sent them any but the best.  The beer served at noblemen’s tables was commonly a year old, and sometimes two, but this age was not usual.  In households generally it was not under a month old, for beer was liked stale if it were not sour, while bread was desired as new as possible so that it was not hot.