SOME CAUSES OF THE PREVAILING DISCONTENT

By Charles Dudley Warner

The Declaration of Independence opens with the statement of a great and fruitful political truth.  But if it had said:—­“We hold these truths to be self-evident:  that all men are created unequal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” it would also have stated the truth; and if it had added, “All men are born in society with certain duties which cannot be disregarded without danger to the social state,” it would have laid down a necessary corollary to the first declaration.  No doubt those who signed the document understood that the second clause limited the first, and that men are created equal only in respect to certain rights.  But the first part of the clause has been taken alone as the statement of a self-evident truth, and the attempt to make this unlimited phrase a reality has caused a great deal of misery.  In connection with the neglect of the idea that the recognition of certain duties is as important as the recognition of rights in the political and social state—­that is, in connection with the doctrine of laissez faire —­this popular notion of equality is one of the most disastrous forces in modern society.

Doubtless men might have been created equal to each other in every respect, with the same mental capacity, the same physical ability, with like inheritances of good or bad qualities, and born into exactly similar conditions, and not dependent on each other.  But men never were so created and born, so far as we have any record of them, and by analogy we have no reason to suppose that they ever will be.  Inequality is the most striking fact in life.  Absolute equality might be better, but so far as we can see, the law of the universe is infinite diversity in unity; and variety in condition is the essential of what we call progress—­it is, in fact, life.  The great doctrine of the Christian era—­the brotherhood of man and the duty of the strong to the weak—­is in sharp contrast with this doctrinarian notion of equality.  The Christian religion never proposed to remove the inequalities of life or its suffering, but by the incoming of charity and contentment and a high mind to give individual men a power to be superior to their conditions.

It cannot, however, be denied that the spirit of Christianity has ameliorated the condition of civilized peoples, cooperating in this with beneficent inventions.  Never were the mass of the people so well fed, so well clad, so well housed, as today in the United States.  Their ordinary daily comforts and privileges were the luxuries of a former age, often indeed unknown and unattainable to the most fortunate and privileged classes.  Nowhere else is it or was it so easy for a man to change his condition, to satisfy his wants, nowhere else has he or had he such advantages