To return for a moment to the subject of general news.  The characteristic of our modern civilization is sensitiveness, or, as the doctors say, nervousness.  Perhaps the philanthropist would term it sympathy.  No doubt an exciting cause of it is the adaptation of electricity to the transmission of facts and ideas.  The telegraph, we say, has put us in sympathy with all the world.  And we reckon this enlargement of nerve contact somehow a gain.  Our bared nerves are played upon by a thousand wires.  Nature, no doubt, has a method of hardening or deadening them to these shocks; but nevertheless, every person who reads is a focus for the excitements, the ills, the troubles, of all the world.  In addition to his local pleasures and annoyances, he is in a manner compelled to be a sharer in the universal uneasiness.  It might be worth while to inquire what effect this exciting accumulation of the news of the world upon an individual or a community has upon happiness and upon character.  Is the New England man any better able to bear or deal with his extraordinary climate by the daily knowledge of the weather all over the globe?  Is a man happier, or improved in character, by the woful tale of a world’s distress and apprehension that greets him every morning at breakfast?  Knowledge, we know, increases sorrow; but I suppose the offset to that is, that strength only comes through suffering.  But this is a digression.

Not second in importance to any department of the journal is the reporting; that is, the special reporting as distinguished from the more general news-gathering.  I mean the reports of proceedings in Congress, in conventions, assemblies, and conferences, public conversations, lectures, sermons, investigations, law trials, and occurrences of all sorts that rise into general importance.  These reports are the basis of our knowledge and opinions.  If they are false or exaggerated, we are ignorant of what is taking place, and misled.  It is of infinitely more importance that they should be absolutely trustworthy than that the editorial comments should be sound and wise.  If the reports on affairs can be depended on, the public can form its own opinion, and act intelligently.  And; if the public has a right to demand anything of a newspaper, it is that its reports of what occurs shall be faithfully accurate, unprejudiced, and colorless.  They ought not, to be editorials, or the vehicles of personal opinion and feeling.  The interpretation of, the facts they give should be left to the editor and the public.  There should be a sharp line drawn between the report and the editorial.