We have been remiss in not proposing a remedy for our present social and economic condition.  Looking backward, we see this.  The scheme may not be practical, any more than the Utopian plans that have been put forward, but it is radical and interesting, and requires, as the other schemes do, a total change in human nature (which may be a good thing to bring about), and a general recasting of the conditions of life.  This is and should be no objection to a socialistic scheme.  Surface measures will not avail.  The suggestion for a minor alleviation of inequality, which seems to have been acted on, namely, that women should propose, has not had the desired effect if it is true, as reported, that the eligible young men are taking to the woods.  The workings of such a measure are as impossible to predict in advance as the operation of the McKinley tariff.  It might be well to legislate that people should be born equal (including equal privileges of the sexes), but the practical difficulty is to keep them equal.  Life is wrong somehow.  Some are born rich and some are born poor, and this inequality makes misery, and then some lose their possessions, which others get hold of, and that makes more misery.  We can put our fingers on the two great evils of life as it now is:  the first is poverty; and the second is infirmity, which is the accompaniment of increasing years.  Poverty, which is only the unequal distribution of things desired, makes strife, and is the opportunity of lawyers; and infirmity is the excuse for doctors.  Think what the world would be without lawyers and doctors!

We are all born young, and most of us are born poor.  Youth is delightful, but we are always getting away from it.  How different it would be if we were always going towards it!  Poverty is unpleasant, and the great struggle of life is to get rid of it; but it is the common fortune that in proportion as wealth is attained the capacity of enjoying it departs.  It seems, therefore, that our life is wrong end first.  The remedy suggested is that men should be born rich and old.  Instead of the necessity of making a fortune, which is of less and less value as death approaches, we should have only the privilege of spending it, and it would have its natural end in the cradle, in which we should be rocked into eternal sleep.  Born old, one would, of course, inherit experience, so that wealth could be made to contribute to happiness, and each day, instead of lessening the natural powers and increasing infirmities, would bring new vigor and capacity of enjoyment.  It would be going from winter to autumn, from autumn to summer, from summer to spring.  The joy of a life without care as to ways and means, and every morning refitted with the pulsations of increasing youth, it is almost impossible to imagine.  Of course this scheme has difficulties on the face of it.  The allotting of the measure of wealth would not be difficult to the socialists, because they would insist that every person should