Some people are Freethinkers from sheer stupidity.  My Uncle Sosthenes was one of these.  Some people are often religious for the same reason.  The very sight of a priest threw my uncle into a violent rage.  He would shake his fist and make grimaces at him, and would then touch a piece of iron when the priest’s back was turned, forgetting that the latter action showed a belief after all, the belief in the evil eye.  Now, when beliefs are unreasonable, one should have all or none at all.  I myself am a Freethinker; I revolt at all dogmas, but feel no anger toward places of worship, be they Catholic, Apostolic, Roman, Protestant, Greek, Russian, Buddhist, Jewish, or Mohammedan.

My uncle was a Freemason, and I used to declare that they are stupider than old women devotees.  That is my opinion, and I maintain it; if we must have any religion at all, the old one is good enough for me.

What is their object?  Mutual help to be obtained by tickling the palms of each other’s hands.  I see no harm in it, for they put into practice the Christian precept:  “Do unto others as ye would they should do unto you.”  The only difference consists in the tickling, but it does not seem worth while to make such a fuss about lending a poor devil half a crown.

To all my arguments my uncle’s reply used to be: 

“We are raising up a religion against a religion; Free Thought will kill clericalism.  Freemasonry is the stronghold, of those who are demolishing all deities.”

“Very well, my dear uncle,” I would reply—­in my heart I felt inclined to say, “You old idiot! it is just that which I am blaming you for.  Instead of destroying, you are organizing competition; it is only a case of lowering prices.  And then, if you admitted only Freethinkers among you, I could understand it, but you admit anybody.  You have a number of Catholics among you, even the leaders of the party.  Pius IX is said to have been one of you before he became pope.  If you call a society with such an organization a bulwark against clericalism, I think it is an extremely weak one.”

“My dear boy,” my uncle would reply, with a wink, “we are most to be dreaded in politics; slowly and surely we are everywhere undermining the monarchical spirit.”

Then I broke out:  “Yes, you are very clever!  If you tell me that Freemasonry is an election machine, I will grant it.  I will never deny that it is used as a machine to control candidates of all shades; if you say that it is only used to hoodwink people, to drill them to go to the polls as soldiers are sent under fire, I agree with you; if you declare that it is indispensable to all political ambitions because it changes all its members into electoral agents, I should say to you:  ’That is as clear as the sun.’  But when you tell me that it serves to undermine the monarchical spirit, I can only laugh in your face.

“Just consider that gigantic and secret democratic association which had Prince Napoleon for its grand master under the Empire; which has the Crown Prince for its grand master in Germany, the Czar’s brother in Russia, and to which the Prince of Wales and King Humbert, and nearly all the crowned heads of the globe belong.”