’Our business was to get him off—­and we got him off.  It’s my business to get my cousin’s husband off, if I can, and we must do it by hook or by crook.  It’s a very difficult piece of work, because he won’t let us employ a barrister.  However, I shall have one in the court and say nothing to him about it at all.  Good-bye, Mr Harding.  As you say, it would be thousand pities that a clergyman should be convicted of a theft;—­and one so well connected too.’

Mr Harding, when he was left alone, began to turn the matter over in his mind and to reflect whether the thousand pities of which Mr Toogood had spoken appertained to the conviction of the criminal, or the doing of the crime.  ’If he did steal the money I suppose he ought to be punished, let him be ever so much a clergyman,’ said Mr Harding to himself.  But yet—­how terrible it would be!  Of clergymen convicted of fraud in London he had often heard; but nothing of the kind had ever disgraced the diocese to which he belonged since he had known it.  He could not teach himself to hope that Mr Crawley should be acquitted if Mr Crawley were guilty;—­but he could teach himself to believe that Mr Crawley was innocent.  Something of a doubt had crept across his mind as he talked to the lawyer.  Mr Toogood, though Mrs Crawley was his cousin, seemed to believe that the money had been stolen; and Mr Toogood as a lawyer ought to understand such matters better than an old secluded clergyman in Barchester.  But, nevertheless, Mr Toogood might be wrong; and Mr Harding succeeded in satisfying himself at last that he could not be doing harm in thinking Mr Toogood was wrong.  When he had made up his mind on this matter he sat down and wrote the following letter, which he addressed to his daughter at the post-office in Florence:-

’Deanery—­, March, 186- ’dearest Nelly, ’When I wrote on Tuesday I told you about poor Mr Crawley, that he was a clergyman in Barsetshire of whose misfortune you read an account in Galignani’s Messenger—­and I think Susan must have written about it also, because everybody here is talking of nothing else, and because, of course, we know how strong a regard the dean has for Mr Crawley.  But since that something has occurred which makes me write to you again—­at once.  A gentleman has just been here, and has indeed only this moment left me, who tells me that he is an attorney in London, and that he is nearly related to Mrs Crawley.  He seems to be a very good-natured man, and I daresay he understands his business as a lawyer.  His name is Toogood, and he has come down as he says to get evidence to help the poor gentleman on his trial.  I cannot understand how this should be necessary, because it seems to me that the evidence should all be wanted on the other side.  I cannot for a moment suppose that a clergyman and a gentleman such as Mr Crawley should have stolen money, and if he is innocent I cannot understand why all this trouble should be necessary to prevent a jury from finding him guilty.