III.

We come now to the documents directly relating to the Memoirs, and among these are several attempts at a preface, in which we see the actual preface coming gradually into form.  One is entitled ’Casanova au Lecteur’, another ‘Histoire de mon Existence’, and a third Preface.  There is also a brief and characteristic ‘Precis de ma vie’, dated November 17, 1797.  Some of these have been printed in Le Livre, 1887.  But by far the most important manuscript that I discovered, one which, apparently, I am the first to discover, is a manuscript entitled ’Extrait du Chapitre 4 et 5.  It is written on paper similar to that on which the Memoirs are written; the pages are numbered 104-148; and though it is described as Extrait, it seems to contain, at all events, the greater part of the missing chapters to which I have already referred, Chapters IV. and V. of the last volume of the Memoirs.  In this manuscript we find Armeline and Scolastica, whose story is interrupted by the abrupt ending of Chapter iii.; we find Mariuccia of Vol.  VII, Chapter IX., who married a hairdresser; and we find also Jaconine, whom Casanova recognises as his daughter, ’much prettier than Sophia, the daughter of Therese Pompeati, whom I had left at London.’  It is curious that this very important manuscript, which supplies the one missing link in the Memoirs, should never have been discovered by any of the few people who have had the opportunity of looking over the Dux manuscripts.  I am inclined to explain it by the fact that the case in which I found this manuscript contains some papers not relating to Casanova.  Probably, those who looked into this case looked no further.  I have told Herr Brockhaus of my discovery, and I hope to see Chapters IV. and V. in their places when the long-looked-for edition of the complete text is at length given to the world.

Another manuscript which I found tells with great piquancy the whole story of the Abbe de Brosses’ ointment, the curing of the Princess de Conti’s pimples, and the birth of the Duc de Montpensier, which is told very briefly, and with much less point, in the Memoirs (vol. iii., p. 327).  Readers of the Memoirs will remember the duel at Warsaw with Count Branicki in 1766 (vol.  X., pp. 274-320), an affair which attracted a good deal of attention at the time, and of which there is an account in a letter from the Abbe Taruffi to the dramatist, Francesco Albergati, dated Warsaw, March 19, 1766, quoted in Ernesto Masi’s Life of Albergati, Bologna, 1878.  A manuscript at Dux in Casanova’s handwriting gives an account of this duel in the third person; it is entitled, ’Description de l’affaire arrivee a Varsovie le 5 Mars, 1766’.  D’Ancona, in the Nuova Antologia (vol. lxvii., p. 412), referring to the Abbe Taruffi’s account, mentions what he considers to be a slight discrepancy:  that Taruffi refers to the danseuse, about whom the duel was fought, as La Casacci, while Casanova refers to her as La Catai.  In this manuscript Casanova always refers to her as La Casacci; La Catai is evidently one of M. Laforgue’s arbitrary alterations of the text.