A. Lincoln.

TELEGRAM TO MRS. GRIMSLEY.

War department, Washington, D. C., August 24, 1863.

Mrs. Elizabeth J. Grimsley, Springfield, Ill.: 

I mail the papers to you to-day appointing Johnny to the Naval school.

A. LINCOLN

TO CRITICS OF EMANCIPATION

To J. C. Conkling.

Executive Mansion, Washington,
August 26, 1863.

Hon.  James C. Conkling.

My dear sir:—­Your letter inviting me to attend a mass meeting of unconditional Union men, to be held at the capital of Illinois, on the 3d day of September, has been received.  It would be very agreeable for me thus to meet my old friends at my own home, but I cannot just now be absent from here so long as a visit there would require.

The meeting is to be of all those who maintain unconditional devotion to the Union, and I am sure that my old political friends will thank me for tendering, as I do, the nation’s gratitude to those other noble men whom no partisan malice or partisan hope can make false to the nation’s life.

There are those who are dissatisfied with me.  To such I would say:  You desire peace, and you blame me that we do not have it.  But how can we obtain it?  There are but three conceivable ways: 

First—­to suppress the rebellion by force of arms.  This I am trying to do.  Are you for it?  If you are, so far we are agreed.  If you are not for it, a second way is to give up the Union.  I am against this.  Are you for it?  If you are you should say so plainly.  If you are not for force nor yet for dissolution, there only remains some imaginable compromise.

I do not believe that any compromise embracing the maintenance of the Union is now possible.  All that I learn leads to a directly opposite belief.  The strength of the rebellion is its military, its army.  That army dominates all the country and all the people within its range.  Any offer of terms made by any man or men within that range, in opposition to that army, is simply nothing for the present; because such man or men have no power whatever to enforce their side of a compromise, if one were made with them.

To illustrate:  Suppose refugees from the South and peace men of the North get together in convention, and frame and proclaim a compromise embracing a restoration of the Union.  In what way can that compromise be used to keep Lee’s army out of Pennsylvania?  Meade’s army can keep Lee’s army out of Pennsylvania, and, I think, can ultimately drive it out of existence.  But no paper compromise to which the controllers of Lee’s army are not agreed can at all affect that army.  In an effort at such compromise we would waste time, which the enemy would improve to our disadvantage; and that would be all.