Two things done by the Ohio Republican convention—­the repudiation of Judge Swan, and the “plank” for a repeal of the Fugitive Slave Law—­I very much regretted.  These two things are of a piece; and they are viewed by many good men, sincerely opposed to slavery, as a struggle against, and in disregard of, the Constitution itself.  And it is the very thing that will greatly endanger our cause, if it be not kept out of our national convention.  There is another thing our friends are doing which gives me some uneasiness.  It is their leaning toward “popular sovereignty.”  There are three substantial objections to this:  First, no party can command respect which sustains this year what it opposed last.  Secondly, Douglas (who is the most dangerous enemy of liberty, because the most insidious one) would have little support in the North, and by consequence, no capital to trade on in the South, if it were not for his friends thus magnifying him and his humbug.  But lastly, and chiefly, Douglas’s popular sovereignty, accepted by the public mind as a just principle, nationalizes slavery, and revives the African slave trade inevitably.

Taking slaves into new Territories, and buying slaves in Africa, are identical things, identical rights or identical wrongs, and the argument which establishes one will establish the other.  Try a thousand years for a sound reason why Congress shall not hinder the people of Kansas from having slaves, and, when you have found it, it will be an equally good one why Congress should not hinder the people of Georgia from importing slaves from Africa.

As to Governor Chase, I have a kind side for him.  He was one of the few distinguished men of the nation who gave us, in Illinois, their sympathy last year.  I never saw him, but suppose him to be able and right-minded; but still he may not be the most suitable as a candidate for the Presidency.

I must say I do not think myself fit for the Presidency.  As you propose a correspondence with me, I shall look for your letters anxiously.

I have not met Dr. Reynolds since receiving your letter; but when I shall, I will present your respects as requested.

Yours very truly,

A. Lincoln.

IT IS BAD TO BE POOR.

TO HAWKINS TAYLOR

Springfield, ill.  Sept. 6, 1859.

Hawkins Taylor, Esq.

Dear sir:—­Yours of the 3d is just received.  There is some mistake about my expected attendance of the U.S.  Court in your city on the 3d Tuesday of this month.  I have had no thought of being there.

It is bad to be poor.  I shall go to the wall for bread and meat if I neglect my business this year as well as last.  It would please me much to see the city and good people of Keokuk, but for this year it is little less than an impossibility.  I am constantly receiving invitations which I am compelled to decline.  I was pressingly urged to go to Minnesota; and I now have two invitations to go to Ohio.  These last are prompted by Douglas going there; and I am really tempted to make a flying trip to Columbus and Cincinnati.