He brings forward part of a speech from Henry Clay,—­the part of the speech of Henry Clay which I used to bring forward to prove precisely the contrary.  I guess we are surrounded to some extent to-day by the old friends of Mr. Clay, and they will be glad to hear anything from that authority.  While he was in Indiana a man presented a petition to liberate his negroes, and he (Mr. Clay) made a speech in answer to it, which I suppose he carefully wrote out himself and caused to be published.  I have before me an extract from that speech which constitutes the evidence this pretended “Old-Line Whig” at Chicago brought forward to show that Mr. Clay did n’t suppose the negro was included in the Declaration of Independence.  Hear what Mr. Clay said: 

“And what is the foundation of this appeal to me in Indiana to liberate the slaves under my care in Kentucky?  It is a general declaration in the act announcing to the world the independence of the thirteen American colonies, that all men are created equal.  Now, as an abstract principle, there is no doubt of the truth of that declaration; and it is desirable, in the original construction of society and in organized societies, to keep it in view as a great fundamental principle.  But, then, I apprehend that in no society that ever did exist, or ever shall be formed, was or can the equality asserted among the members of the human race be practically enforced and carried out.  There are portions, large portions, women, minors, insane, culprits, transient sojourners, that will always probably remain subject to the government of another portion of the community.

“That declaration, whatever may be the extent of its import, was made by the delegations of the thirteen States.  In most of them slavery existed, and had long existed, and was established by law.  It was introduced and forced upon the colonies by the paramount law of England.  Do you believe that in making that declaration the States that concurred in it intended that it should be tortured into a virtual emancipation of all the slaves within their respective limits?  Would Virginia and other Southern States have ever united in a declaration which was to be interpreted into an abolition of slavery among them?  Did any one of the thirteen colonies entertain such a design or expectation?  To impute such a secret and unavowed purpose, would be to charge a political fraud upon the noblest band of patriots that ever assembled in council,—­a fraud upon the Confederacy of the Revolution; a fraud upon the union of those States whose Constitution not only recognized the lawfulness of slavery, but permitted the importation of slaves from Africa until the year 1808.”