do not know; but I know that in his speech at Springfield he spoke of it as a thing they had not decided yet; and in his answer to me at Freeport, he spoke of it, so far, again, as I can comprehend it, as a thing that had not yet been decided.  Now, I hold that if the Judge does entertain that view, I think that he is not mistaken in so far as it can be said that the court has not decided anything save the mere question of jurisdiction.  I know the legal arguments that can be made,—­that after a court has decided that it cannot take jurisdiction in a case, it then has decided all that is before it, and that is the end of it.  A plausible argument can be made in favor of that proposition; but I know that Judge Douglas has said in one of his speeches that the court went forward, like honest men as they were, and decided all the points in the case.  If any points are really extra-judicially decided, because not necessarily before them, then this one as to the power of the Territorial Legislature, to exclude slavery is one of them, as also the one that the Missouri Compromise was null and void.  They are both extra-judicial, or neither is, according as the court held that they had no jurisdiction in the case between the parties, because of want of capacity of one party to maintain a suit in that court.  I want, if I have sufficient time, to show that the court did pass its opinion; but that is the only thing actually done in the case.  If they did not decide, they showed what they were ready to decide whenever the matter was before them.  What is that opinion?  After having argued that Congress had no power to pass a law excluding slavery from a United States Territory, they then used language to this effect:  That inasmuch as Congress itself could not exercise such a power, it followed as a matter of course that it could not authorize a Territorial government to exercise it; for the Territorial Legislature can do no more than Congress could do.  Thus it expressed its opinion emphatically against the power of a Territorial Legislature to exclude slavery, leaving us in just as little doubt on that point as upon any other point they really decided.

Now, my fellow-citizens, I will detain you only a little while longer; my time is nearly out.  I find a report of a speech made by Judge Douglas at Joliet, since we last met at Freeport,—­published, I believe, in the Missouri Republican, on the 9th of this month, in which Judge Douglas says: 

“You know at Ottawa I read this platform, and asked him if he concurred in each and all of the principles set forth in it.  He would not answer these questions.  At last I said frankly, I wish you to answer them, because when I get them up here where the color of your principles are a little darker than in Egypt, I intend to trot you down to Jonesboro.  The very notice that I was going to take him down to Egypt made him tremble in his knees so that he had to be carried from the platform.  He laid up seven days, and in the meantime held a consultation with his political physicians; they had Lovejoy and Farnsworth and all the leaders of the Abolition party, they consulted it all over, and at last Lincoln came to the conclusion that he would answer, so he came up to Freeport last Friday.”