“Resolved, That this Convention is in favor of the Wilmot Proviso, both in Principle and Practice, and that we know of no good reason why any person should oppose the largest latitude in Free Soil, Free Territory and Free speech.

“Resolved, That in the opinion of this Convention, the time has arrived when all men should be free, whites as well as others.”

[Judge Douglas:  What is the date of those resolutions?]

I understand it was in 1850, but I do not know it.  I do not state a thing and say I know it, when I do not.  But I have the highest belief that this is so.  I know of no way to arrive at the conclusion that there is an error in it.  I mean to put a case no stronger than the truth will allow.  But what I was going to comment upon is an extract from a newspaper in De Kalb County; and it strikes me as being rather singular, I confess, under the circumstances.  There is a Judge Mayo in that county, who is a candidate for the Legislature, for the purpose, if he secures his election, of helping to re-elect Judge Douglas.  He is the editor of a newspaper [De Kalb County Sentinel], and in that paper I find the extract I am going to read.  It is part of an editorial article in which he was electioneering as fiercely as he could for Judge Douglas and against me.  It was a curious thing, I think, to be in such a paper.  I will agree to that, and the Judge may make the most of it: 

“Our education has been such that we have been rather in favor of the equality of the blacks; that is, that they should enjoy all the privileges of the whites where they reside.  We are aware that this is not a very popular doctrine.  We have had many a confab with some who are now strong ‘Republicans’ we taking the broad ground of equality, and they the opposite ground.

“We were brought up in a State where blacks were voters, and we do not know of any inconvenience resulting from it, though perhaps it would not work as well where the blacks are more numerous.  We have no doubt of the right of the whites to guard against such an evil, if it is one.  Our opinion is that it would be best for all concerned to have the colored population in a State by themselves [in this I agree with him]; but if within the jurisdiction of the United States, we say by all means they should have the right to have their Senators and Representatives in Congress, and to vote for President.  With us ’worth makes the man, and want of it the fellow.’  We have seen many a ‘nigger’ that we thought more of than some white men.”

That is one of Judge Douglas’s friends.  Now, I do not want to leave myself in an attitude where I can be misrepresented, so I will say I do not think the Judge is responsible for this article; but he is quite as responsible for it as I would be if one of my friends had said it.  I think that is fair enough.

I have here also a set of resolutions passed by a Democratic State Convention in Judge Douglas’s own good State of Vermont, that I think ought to be good for him too: