As introductory to these interrogatories which Judge Douglas propounded to me at Ottawa, he read a set of resolutions which he said Judge Trumbull and myself had participated in adopting, in the first Republican State Convention, held at Springfield in October, 1854.  He insisted that I and Judge Trumbull, and perhaps the entire Republican party, were responsible for the doctrines contained in the set of resolutions which he read, and I understand that it was from that set of resolutions that he deduced the interrogatories which he propounded to me, using these resolutions as a sort of authority for propounding those questions to me.  Now, I say here to-day that I do not answer his interrogatories because of their springing at all from that set of resolutions which he read.  I answered them because Judge Douglas thought fit to ask them.  I do not now, nor ever did, recognize any responsibility upon myself in that set of resolutions.  When I replied to him on that occasion, I assured him that I never had anything to do with them.  I repeat here to today that I never in any possible form had anything to do with that set of resolutions It turns out, I believe, that those resolutions were never passed in any convention held in Springfield.

It turns out that they were never passed at any convention or any public meeting that I had any part in.  I believe it turns out, in addition to all this, that there was not, in the fall of 1854, any convention holding a session in Springfield, calling itself a Republican State Convention; yet it is true there was a convention, or assemblage of men calling themselves a convention, at Springfield, that did pass some resolutions.  But so little did I really know of the proceedings of that convention, or what set of resolutions they had passed, though having a general knowledge that there had been such an assemblage of men there, that when Judge Douglas read the resolutions, I really did not know but they had been the resolutions passed then and there.  I did not question that they were the resolutions adopted.  For I could not bring myself to suppose that Judge Douglas could say what he did upon this subject without knowing that it was true.  I contented myself, on that occasion, with denying, as I truly could, all connection with them, not denying or affirming whether they were passed at Springfield.  Now, it turns out that he had got hold of some resolutions passed at some convention or public meeting in Kane County.  I wish to say here, that I don’t conceive that in any fair and just mind this discovery relieves me at all.  I had just as much to do with the convention in Kane County as that at Springfield.  I am as much responsible for the resolutions at Kane County as those at Springfield,—­the amount of the responsibility being exactly nothing in either case; no more than there would be in regard to a set of resolutions passed in the moon.