Sometime after my colleague [Mr. Richardson] introduced the resolutions I have mentioned, I introduced a preamble, resolution, and interrogations, intended to draw the President out, if possible, on this hitherto untrodden ground.  To show their relevancy, I propose to state my understanding of the true rule for ascertaining the boundary between Texas and Mexico.  It is that wherever Texas was exercising jurisdiction was hers; and wherever Mexico was exercising jurisdiction was hers; and that whatever separated the actual exercise of jurisdiction of the one from that of the other was the true boundary between them.  If, as is probably true, Texas was exercising jurisdiction along the western bank of the Nueces, and Mexico was exercising it along the eastern bank of the Rio Grande, then neither river was the boundary:  but the uninhabited country between the two was.  The extent of our territory in that region depended not on any treaty-fixed boundary (for no treaty had attempted it), but on revolution.  Any people anywhere being inclined and having the power have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better.  This is a most valuable, a most sacred right—­a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.  Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing government may choose to exercise it.  Any portion of such people that can may revolutionize and make their own of so much of the territory as they inhabit.  More than this, a majority of any portion of such people may revolutionize, putting down a minority, intermingled with or near about them, who may oppose this movement.  Such minority was precisely the case of the Tories of our own revolution.  It is a quality of revolutions not to go by old lines or old laws, but to break up both, and make new ones.

As to the country now in question, we bought it of France in 1803, and sold it to Spain in 1819, according to the President’s statements.  After this, all Mexico, including Texas, revolutionized against Spain; and still later Texas revolutionized against Mexico.  In my view, just so far as she carried her resolution by obtaining the actual, willing or unwilling, submission of the people, so far the country was hers, and no farther.  Now, sir, for the purpose of obtaining the very best evidence as to whether Texas had actually carried her revolution to the place where the hostilities of the present war commenced, let the President answer the interrogatories I proposed, as before mentioned, or some other similar ones.  Let him answer fully, fairly, and candidly.  Let him answer with facts and not with arguments.  Let him remember he sits where Washington sat, and so remembering, let him answer as Washington would answer.  As a nation should not, and the Almighty will not, be evaded, so let him attempt no evasion—­no equivocation.  And if, so answering, he can show that the soil was ours where the first blood of the