My dear sir:  Yesterday morning the court overruled the demurrer to Hatches return in the mandamus case.  McClernand was present; said nothing about pleading over; and so I suppose the matter is ended.

The court gave no reason for the decision; but Peck tells me confidentially that they were unanimous in the opinion that even if the Gov’r had signed the bill purposely, he had the right to scratch his name off so long as the bill remained in his custody and control.

Yours as ever,
A. Lincoln.

TO H. C. WHITNEY.

Springfield, December 18, 1857. 
Henry C. Whitney, Esq.

My dear sir:—­Coming home from Bloomington last night I found your letter of the 15th.

I know of no express statute or decisions as to what a J. P. upon the expiration of his term shall do with his docket books, papers, unfinished business, etc., but so far as I know, the practice has been to hand over to the successor, and to cease to do anything further whatever, in perfect analogy to Sections 110 and 112, and I have supposed and do suppose this is the law.  I think the successor may forthwith do whatever the retiring J. P. might have done.  As to the proviso to Section 114 I think it was put in to cover possible cases, by way of caution, and not to authorize the J. P. to go forward and finish up whatever might have been begun by him.

The view I take, I believe, is the Common law principle, as to retiring officers and their successors, to which I remember but one exception, which is the case of Sheriff and ministerial officers of that class.

I have not had time to examine this subject fully, but I have great confidence I am right.  You must not think of offering me pay for this.

Mr. John O. Johnson is my friend; I gave your name to him.  He is doing the work of trying to get up a Republican organization.  I do not suppose “Long John” ever saw or heard of him.  Let me say to you confidentially, that I do not entirely appreciate what the Republican papers of Chicago are so constantly saying against “Long John.”  I consider those papers truly devoted to the Republican cause, and not unfriendly to me; but I do think that more of what they say against “Long John” is dictated by personal malice than themselves are conscious of.  We can not afford to lose the services of “Long John” and I do believe the unrelenting warfare made upon him is injuring our cause.  I mean this to be confidential.

If you quietly co-operate with Mr. J. O. Johnson on getting up an organization, I think it will be right.

Your friend as ever,
A. Lincoln.

1858
Another political patronage reference
to Edward G. Miner.

Springfield, Feb.19, 1858. 
My dear sir: