Another of Miller’s answers I will prove both by common sense and the Court of Record is untrue.  To one question he answers, “Anderson brought a suit against me before James Adams, then an acting justice of the peace in Sangamon County, before whom he obtained a judgment.

“Q.—­Did you remove the same by injunction to the Sangamon Circuit Court?  Ans.—­I did remove it.”

Now mark—­it is said he removed it by injunction.  The word “injunction” in common language imports a command that some person or thing shall not move or be removed; in law it has the same meaning.  An injunction issuing out of chancery to a justice of the peace is a command to him to stop all proceedings in a named case until further orders.  It is not an order to remove but to stop or stay something that is already moving.  Besides this, the records of the Sangamon Circuit Court show that the judgment of which Miller swore was never removed into said Court by injunction or otherwise.

I have now to take notice of a part of Adams’s address which in the order of time should have been noticed before.  It is in these words:  “I have now shown, in the opinion of two competent judges, that the handwriting of the forged assignment differed from mine, and by one of them that it could not be mistaken for mine.”  That is false.  Tinsley no doubt is the judge referred to; and by reference to his certificate it will be seen that he did not say the handwriting of the assignment could not be mistaken for Adams’s—­nor did he use any other expression substantially, or anything near substantially, the same.  But if Tinsley had said the handwriting could not be mistaken for Adams’s, it would have been equally unfortunate for Adams:  for it then would have contradicted Keys, who says, “I looked at the writing and judged it the said Adams’s or a good imitation.”

Adams speaks with much apparent confidence of his success on attending lawsuits, and the ultimate maintenance of his title to the land in question.  Without wishing to disturb the pleasure of his dream, I would say to him that it is not impossible that he may yet be taught to sing a different song in relation to the matter.

At the end of Miller’s deposition, Adams asks, “Will Mr. Lincoln now say that he is almost convinced my title to this ten acre tract of land is founded in fraud?” I answer, I will not.  I will now change the phraseology so as to make it run—­I am quite convinced, &c.  I cannot pass in silence Adams’s assertion that he has proved that the forged assignment was not in the deed when it came from his house by Talbott, the recorder.  In this, although Talbott has sworn that the assignment was in the bundle of deeds when it came from his house, Adams has the unaccountable assurance to say that he has proved the contrary by Talbott.  Let him or his friends attempt to show wherein he proved any such thing by Talbott.