the antipathy to a standing army insurmountably strong
even in the late Parliament, a Parliament disposed
to place large confidence in them and in their master.
In the new Parliament that antipathy amounted almost
to a mania. That liberty, law, property, could
never be secured while the Sovereign had a large body
of regular troops at his command in time of peace,
and that of all regular troops foreign troops were
the most to be dreaded, had, during the recent elections,
been repeated in every town hall and market place,
and scrawled upon every dead wall. The reductions
of the preceding year, it was said, even if they had
been honestly carved into effect, would not have been
sufficient; and they had not been honestly carried
into effect. On this subject the ministers pronounced
the temper of the Commons to be such that, if any
person high in office were to ask for what His Majesty
thought necessary, there would assuredly be a violent
explosion; the majority would probably be provoked
into disbanding all that remained of the army; and
the kingdom would be left without a single soldier.
William, however, could not be brought to believe
that the case was so hopeless. He listened too
easily to some secret adviser, Sunderland was probably
the man, who accused Montague and Somers of cowardice
and insincerity. They had, it was whispered in
the royal ear, a majority, whenever they really wanted
one. They were bent upon placing their friend
Littleton in the Speaker’s chair; and they had
carried their point triumphantly. They would
carry as triumphantly a vote for a respectable military
establishment if the honour of their master and the
safety of their country were as dear to them as the
petty interests of their own faction. It was
to no purpose that the King was told, what was nevertheless
perfectly true, that not one half of the members who
had voted for Littleton, could, by any art or eloquence,
be induced to vote for an augmentation of the land
force. While he was urging his ministers to stand
up manfully against the popular prejudice, and while
they were respectfully representing to him that by
so standing up they should only make that prejudice
stronger and more noxious, the day came which the
Commons had fixed for taking the royal speech into
consideration. The House resolved itself into
a Committee. The great question was instantly
raised; What provision should be made for the defence
of the realm? It was naturally expected that
the confidential advisers of the Crown would propose
something. As they remained silent, Harley took
the lead which properly belonged to them, and moved
that the army should not exceed seven thousand men.
Sir Charles Sedley suggested ten thousand. Vernon,
who was present, was of opinion that this number would
have been carved if it had been proposed by one who
was known to speak on behalf of the King. But
few members cared to support an amendment which was
certain to be less pleasing to their constituents,
and did not appear to be more pleasing to the Court,
than the original motion. Harley’s resolution
passed the Committee. On the morrow it was reported
and approved. The House also resolved that all
the seven thousand men who were to be retained should
be natural born English subjects. Other votes
were carried without a single division either in the
Committee or when the mace was on the table.