a still more severe censure on two generations of
Granvilles, on two generations of Hydes, and on two
generations of Finches. At last some ingenious
Tory thought of a device by which it might be possible
to strike the enemy without wounding friends.
The grants of Charles and James had been made in time
of peace; and William’s grant to Somers had been
made in time of war. Malice eagerly caught at
this childish distinction. It was moved that
any minister who had been concerned in passing a grant
for his own benefit while the nation was under the
heavy taxes of the late war had violated his trust;
as if the expenditure which is necessary to secure
to the country a good administration of justice ought
to be suspended by war; or as if it were not criminal
in a government to squander the resources of the state
in time of peace. The motion was made by James
Brydges, eldest son of the Lord Chandos, the James
Brydges who afterwards became Duke of Chandos, who
raised a gigantic fortune out of war taxes, to squander
it in comfortless and tasteless ostentation, and who
is still remembered as the Timon of Pope’s keen
and brilliant satire. It was remarked as extraordinary
that Brydges brought forward and defended his motion
merely as the assertion of an abstract truth, and
avoided all mention of the Chancellor. It seemed
still more extraordinary that Howe, whose whole eloquence
consisted in cutting personalities, named nobody on
this occasion, and contented himself with declaiming
in general terms against corruption and profusion.
It was plain that the enemies of Somers were at once
urged forward by hatred and kept back by fear.
They knew that they could not carry a resolution directly
condemning him. They, therefore, cunningly brought
forward a mere speculative proposition which many members
might be willing to affirm without scrutinising it
severely. But, as soon as the major premise had
been admitted, the minor would be without difficulty
established; and it would be impossible to avoid coming
to the conclusion that Somers had violated his trust.
Such tactics, however, have very seldom succeeded in
English parliaments; for a little good sense and a
little straightforwardness are quite sufficient to
confound them. A sturdy Whig member, Sir Rowland
Gwyn, disconcerted the whole scheme of operations.
“Why this reserve?” he said, “Everybody
knows your meaning. Everybody sees that you have
not the courage to name the great man whom you are
trying to destroy.” “That is false,”
cried Brydges; and a stormy altercation followed.
It soon appeared that innocence would again triumph.
The two parties seemed to have exchanged characters
for one day. The friends of the government, who
in the Parliament were generally humble and timorous,
took a high tone, and spoke as it becomes men to speak
who are defending persecuted genius and virtue.
The malecontents, generally so insolent and turbulent,
seemed to be completely cowed. They abased themselves
so low as to protest, what no human being could believe,