away.  The connections which had been the strength and boast of the corporation were now its weakness and its shame.  The King who had been one of its members was an exile.  The judge by whom all its most exorbitant pretensions had been pronounced legitimate was a prisoner.  All the old enemies of the Company, reinforced by those great Whig merchants whom Child had expelled from the direction, demanded justice and vengeance from the Whig House of Commons, which had just placed William and Mary on the throne.  No voice was louder in accusation than that of Papillon, who had, some years before, been more zealous for the charter than any man in London.170 The Commons censured in severe terms the persons who had inflicted death by martial law at Saint Helena, and even resolved that some of those offenders should be excluded from the Act of Indemnity.171 The great question, how the trade with the East should for the future be carried on, was referred to a Committee.  The report was to have been made on the twenty-seventh of January 1690; but on that very day the Parliament ceased to exist.

The first two sessions of the succeeding Parliament were so short and so busy that little was said about India in either House.  But, out of Parliament, all the arts both of controversy and of intrigue were employed on both sides.  Almost as many pamphlets were published about the India trade as about the oaths.  The despot of Leadenhall Street was libelled in prose and verse.  Wretched puns were made on his name.  He was compared to Cromwell, to the King of France, to Goliath of Gath, to the Devil.  It was vehemently declared to be necessary that, in any Act which might be passed for the regulation of our traffic with the Eastern seas, Sir Josiah should be by name excluded from all trust.172

There were, however, great differences of opinion among those who agreed in hating Child and the body of which he was the head.  The manufacturers of Spitalfields, of Norwich, of Yorkshire, and of the Western counties, considered the trade with the Eastern seas as rather injurious than beneficial to the kingdom.  The importation of Indian spices, indeed, was admitted to be harmless, and the importation of Indian saltpetre to be necessary.  But the importation of silks and of Bengals, as shawls were then called, was pronounced to be a curse to the country.  The effect of the growing taste for such frippery was that our gold and silver went abroad, and that much excellent English drapery lay in our warehouses till it was devoured by the moths.  Those, it was said, were happy days for the inhabitants both of our pasture lands and of our manufacturing towns, when every gown, every hanging, every bed, was made of materials which our own flocks had furnished to our own looms.  Where were now the brave old hangings of arras which had adorned the walls of lordly mansions in the days of Elizabeth?  And was it not a shame to see a gentleman, whose ancestors had worn nothing but stuffs made by English workmen out of English fleeces, flaunting in a calico shirt and a pair of silk stockings?  Clamours such as these had, a few years before, extorted from Parliament the Act which required that the dead should be wrapped in woollen; and some sanguine clothiers hoped that the legislature would, by excluding all Indian textures from our ports, impose the same necessity on the living.173