“When I was Treasurer, in King Charles’s time, my Lords, the excise was to be farmed.  There were several bidders.  Harry Savile, for whom I had a great value, informed me that they had asked for his interest with me, and begged me to tell them that he had done his best for them.  ‘What!’ said I; ’tell them all so, when only one can have the farm?’ ‘No matter;’ said Harry:  ’tell them all so; and the one who gets the farm will think that he owes it to me.’  The gentlemen came.  I said to every one of them separately, ‘Sir, you are much obliged to Mr. Savile;’ ’Sir, Mr. Savile has been much your friend.’  In the end Harry got a handsome present; and I wished him good luck with it.  I was his shadow then.  I am Mr. Bates’s shadow now.”

The Duke had hardly related this anecdote, so strikingly illustrative of the state of political morality in that generation, when it was whispered to him that a motion to impeach him had been made in the House of Commons.  He hastened thither; but, before he arrived, the question had been put and carried.  Nevertheless he pressed for admittance; and he was admitted.  A chair, according to ancient usage, was placed for him within the bar; and he was informed that the House was ready to hear him.

He spoke, but with less tact and judgment than usual.  He magnified his own public services.  But for him, he said, there would have been no House of Commons to impeach him; a boast so extravagant that it naturally made his hearers unwilling to allow him the praise which his conduct at the time of the Revolution really deserved.  As to the charge against him he said little more than that he was innocent, that there had long been a malicious design to ruin him, that he would not go into particulars, that the facts which had been proved would bear two constructions, and that of the two constructions the most favourable ought in candour to be adopted.  He withdrew, after praying the House to reconsider the vote which had just been passed, or, if that could not be, to let him have speedy justice.

His friends felt that his speech was no defence, and did not attempt to rescind the resolution which had been carried just before he was heard.  Wharton, with a large following, went up to the Lords, and informed them that the Commons had resolved to impeach the Duke.  A committee of managers was appointed to draw up the articles and to prepare the evidence.583

The articles were speedily drawn; but to the chain of evidence one link appeared to be wanting.  That link Robart, if he had been severely examined and confronted with other witnesses, would in all probability have been forced to supply.  He was summoned to the bar of the Commons.  A messenger went with the summons to the house of the Duke of Leeds, and was there informed that the Swiss was not within, that he had been three days absent, and that where he was the porter could not tell.  The Lords immediately presented an address to the King, requesting him to give orders that the ports might be stopped and the fugitive arrested.  But Robart was already in Holland on his way to his native mountains.