curate, wrote a book which convinced all sensible and dispassionate readers that Gauden, and not Charles the First, was the author of the Icon Basilike.  This book Fraser suffered to be printed.  If he had authorised the publication of a work in which the Gospel of Saint John or the Epistle to the Romans had been represented as spurious, the indignation of the High Church party could hardly have been greater.  The question was not literary, but religious.  Doubt was impiety.  In truth the Icon was to many fervent Royalists a supplementary revelation.  One of them indeed had gone so far as to propose that lessons taken out of the inestimable little volume should be read in the churches.380 Fraser found it necessary to resign his place; and Nottingham appointed a gentleman of good blood and scanty fortune named Edmund Bohun.  This change of men produced an immediate and total change of system; for Bohun was as strong a Tory as a conscientious man who had taken the oaths could possibly be.  He had been conspicuous as a persecutor of nonconformists and a champion of the doctrine of passive obedience.  He had edited Filmer’s absurd treatise on the origin of government, and had written an answer to the paper which Algernon Sidney had delivered to the Sheriffs on Tower Hill.  Nor did Bohun admit that, in swearing allegiance to William and Mary, he had done any thing inconsistent with his old creed.  For he had succeeded in convincing himself that they reigned by right of conquest, and that it was the duty of an Englishman to serve them as faithfully as Daniel had served Darius or as Nehemiah had served Artaxerxes.  This doctrine, whatever peace it might bring to his own conscience, found little favour with any party.  The Whigs loathed it as servile; the Jacobites loathed it as revolutionary.  Great numbers of Tories had doubtless submitted to William on the ground that he was, rightfully or wrongfully, King in possession; but very few of them were disposed to allow that his possession had originated in conquest.  Indeed the plea which had satisfied the weak and narrow mind of Bohun was a mere fiction, and, had it been a truth, would have been a truth not to be uttered by Englishmen without agonies of shame and mortification.381 He however clung to his favourite whimsy with a tenacity which the general disapprobation only made more intense.  His old friends, the stedfast adherents of indefeasible hereditary right, grew cold and reserved.  He asked Sancroft’s blessing, and got only a sharp word, and a black look.  He asked Ken’s blessing; and Ken, though not much in the habit of transgressing the rules of Christian charity and courtesy, murmured something about a little scribbler.  Thus cast out by one faction, Bohun was not received by any other.  He formed indeed a class apart; for he was at once a zealous Filmerite and a zealous Williamite.  He held that pure monarchy, not limited by any law or contract, was the form of government which had been divinely ordained.  But he held that William