safe conduct in the largest terms.198 The safe conduct was sent.  Six weeks passed, and nothing was heard of the witnesses.  The friends of the lords and gentlemen who had been accused represented strongly that the House ought not to separate for the summer without coming to some decision on charges so grave.  Fuller was ordered to attend.  He pleaded sickness, and asserted, not for the first time, that the Jacobites had poisoned him.  But all his plans were confounded by the laudable promptitude and vigour with which the Commons acted.  A Committee was sent to his bedside, with orders to ascertain whether he really had any witnesses, and where those witnesses resided.  The members who were deputed for this purpose went to the King’s Bench prison, and found him suffering under a disorder, produced, in all probability, by some emetic which he had swallowed for the purpose of deceiving them.  In answer to their questions he said that two of his witnesses, Delaval and Hayes, were in England, and were lodged at the house of a Roman Catholic apothecary in Holborn.  The Commons, as soon as the Committee had reported, sent some members to the house which he had indicated.  That house and all the neighbouring houses were searched.  Delaval and Hayes were not to be found, nor had any body in the vicinity ever seen such men or heard of them.  The House, therefore, on the last day of the session, just before Black Rod knocked at the door, unanimously resolved that William Fuller was a cheat and a false accuser; that he had insulted the Government and the Parliament; that he had calumniated honourable men, and that an address should be carried up to the throne, requesting that he might be prosecuted for his villany.199 He was consequently tried, convicted, and sentenced to fine, imprisonment and the pillory.  The exposure, more terrible than death to a mind not lost to all sense of shame, he underwent with a hardihood worthy of his two favourite models, Dangerfield and Oates.  He had the impudence to persist, year after year, in affirming that he had fallen a victim to the machinations of the late King, who had spent six thousand pounds in order to ruin him.  Delaval and Hayes—­so this fable ran—­had been instructed by James in person.  They had, in obedience to his orders, induced Fuller to pledge his word for their appearance, and had then absented themselves, and left him exposed to the resentment of the House of Commons.200 The story had the reception which it deserved, and Fuller sank into an obscurity from which he twice or thrice, at long intervals, again emerged for a moment into infamy.