satisfaction—­which, I fear, was not altogether Christian-like—­in their “raking-down.”  If Mr. Daws expected York and Scott to shake hands after the sermon, he was disappointed.  But he did not relax his purpose.  With that quiet fearlessness and determination which had won for him the respect of men who were too apt to regard piety as synonymous with effeminacy, he attacked Scott in his own house.  What he said has not been recorded, but it is to be feared that it was part of his sermon.  When he had concluded, Scott looked at him, not unkindly, over the glasses of his bar, and said, less irreverently than the words might convey, “Young man, I rather like your style; but when you know York and me as well as you do God Almighty, it’ll be time to talk.”

And so the feud progressed; and so, as in more illustrious examples, the private and personal enmity of two representative men led gradually to the evolution of some crude, half-expressed principle or belief.  It was not long before it was made evident that those beliefs were identical with certain broad principles laid down by the founders of the American Constitution, as expounded by the statesmanlike A; or were the fatal quicksands, on which the ship of state might be wrecked, warningly pointed out by the eloquent B. The practical result of all which was the nomination of York and Scott to represent the opposite factions of Sandy Bar in legislative councils.

For some weeks past, the voters of Sandy Bar and the adjacent camps had been called upon, in large type, to “Rally!” In vain the great pines at the cross-roads—­whose trunks were compelled to bear this and other legends—­moaned and protested from their windy watch-towers.  But one day, with fife and drum, and flaming transparency, a procession filed into the triangular grove at the head of the gulch.  The meeting was called to order by Colonel Starbottle, who, having once enjoyed legislative functions, and being vaguely known as a “war-horse,” was considered to be a valuable partisan of York.  He concluded an appeal for his friend, with an enunciation of principles, interspersed with one or two anecdotes so gratuitously coarse that the very pines might have been moved to pelt him with their cast-off cones, as he stood there.  But he created a laugh, on which his candidate rode into popular notice; and when York rose to speak, he was greeted with cheers.  But, to the general astonishment, the new speaker at once launched into bitter denunciation of his rival.  He not only dwelt upon Scott’s deeds and example, as known to Sandy Bar, but spoke of facts connected with his previous career, hitherto unknown to his auditors.  To great precision of epithet and directness of statement, the speaker added the fascination of revelation and exposure.  The crowd cheered, yelled, and were delighted, but when this astounding philippic was concluded, there was a unanimous call for “Scott!” Colonel Starbottle would have resisted this manifest impropriety, but in vain.  Partly from a crude sense of justice, partly from a meaner craving for excitement, the assemblage was inflexible; and Scott was dragged, pushed, and pulled upon the platform.