or citizen, slave or master, all being phony qualities which we are not to heed, as their origin is tainted with violence and robbery.  Strip off these superfluous garments; let us take Man in himself, the same under all conditions, in all situations, in all countries, in all ages, and strive to ascertain what sort of association is the best adapted to him.  The problem thus stated, the rest follows. — In accordance with the customs of the classic mentality, and with the precepts of the prevailing ideology, a political system is now constructed after a mathematical model.[2] A simple statement is selected, and set apart, very general, familiar, readily apparent, and easily understood by the most ignorant and inattentive schoolboy.  Reject every difference, which separates one man from other men; retain of him only the portion common to him and to others.  The remainder constitutes Man in general, or in other words,

“a sensitive and rational being who, thus endowed, avoids pain and seeks pleasure,” and therefore aspiring to happiness, namely, a stable condition in which one enjoys greater pleasure than pain,"[3] or, again, “a sensitive being capable of forming rational opinions and of acquiring moral ideas."[4]

Anyone (they say)may by himself experience this elementary idea, and can verify it at the first glance.  Such is the social unit; let several of these be combined, a thousand, a hundred thousand, a million, twenty-six millions, and you have the French people.  Men born at twenty-one years of age, without relations, without a past, without traditions, without a country, are supposed to be assembled for the first time and, for the first time, to treat with each other.  In this position, at the moment of contracting together, all are equal:  for, as the definition states, the extrinsic and spurious qualities through which alone all differ have been rejected.  All are free; for, according to the definition, the unjust thralldom imposed on all by brute force and by hereditary prejudice has been suppressed. — But if all men are equal, no reason exists why, in this contract, any special advantage should be conceded to one more than to another.  Accordingly all shall be equal before the law; no person, or family, or class, shall be allowed any privilege; no one shall claim a right of which another might be deprived; no one shall be subject to any duty from another is exempt. — On the other hand, all being free, each enters with a free will along with the group of wills constitute the new community; it is necessary that in the common resolutions he should fully concur.  Only on these conditions does he bind himself; he is bound to respect laws only because he has assisted in making them, and to obey magistrates only because he has aided in electing them.  Underneath all legitimate authority his consent or his vote must be apparent, while, in the humblest citizen, the most exalted of public powers must recognize a member of their own