You need me because I am rich and you are poor:  let us then make an agreement together.  I will allow you the honor of serving me on condition that you give me the little that remains to you for the trouble I have in governing you.”

This shows the spirit, the aim and the effect of political society.  —­ At the start, according to Rousseau, it consisted of an unfair bargain, made by an adroit rich man with a poor dupe, “providing new fetters for the weak and fresh power for the rich,” and, under the title of legitimate property, consecrating the usurpation of the soil.  —­ To day the contract is still more unjust " by means of which a child may govern an old man, a fool lead the wise, and a handful of people live in abundance whilst a famished multitude lack the necessities for life.”  It is the nature of inequality to grow; hence the authority of some increases along with the dependence of the rest, so that the two conditions, having at last reached their extremes, the hereditary and perpetual objection of the people seems to be a divine right equally with the hereditary and perpetual despotism of the king.  —­ This is the present situation and, any change, will be for the worse.  “For,[41] the occupation of all kings, or of those charged with their functions, consists wholly of two objects, to extend their sway abroad and to render it more absolute at home.”  When they plead some other cause it is only a pretext.  “The terms public good, happiness of subjects, the glory of the nation, so heavily employed in government announcements, never denote other than disastrous commands, and the people shudder beforehand when its masters allude to their paternal solicitude.” —­ However, this fatal point once reached, “the contract with the government is dissolved; the despot is master only while remaining the most powerful, and, as soon as he can be expelled, it is useless for him to cry out against violence.”  Because right can only exist through consent, and no consent nor right can exist between master and slave.

Whether between one man and another man, or between one man and a people, the following is an absurd address:  ’ I make an agreement with you wholly at your expense and to my advantage which I shall respect as long as I please and which you shall respect as long as it pleases me.’ " —­

Only madmen may sign such a treaty, but, as madmen, they are not in a condition to negotiate and their signature is not binding.  Only the vanquished on the ground, with swords pointed at their throats, may accept such conditions but, being under constraint, their promise is null and void.  Madmen and the conquered may for a thousand years have bound over all subsequent generations, but a contract for a minor is not a contract for an adult, and on the child arriving at the age of Reason he belongs to himself.  We at last have become adults, and we have only to make use of our rights to reduce the pretensions of this self-styled authority to their just value.  It has power on its side and nothing more.  But “a pistol in the hand of a brigand is also power,” but do you think that I should be morally obliged to give him my purse? —­ I obey only compelled by force and I will have my purse back as soon as I can take his pistol away from him.