Cauchon arises accordingly, not at first with any infamy, out of the obscurity.  He had been expelled and dethroned from his See, but this only for political reasons.  He was ecclesiastically Bishop of Beauvais still; it was within his diocese that the Maid had taken prisoner, and there also her last acts of magic, if magic there was, had taken place.  He had therefore a legal right to claim the jurisdiction, a right which no one had any interest in taking from him.  If Paris was disappointed at not having so interesting a trial carried on before its courts, there was compensation in the fact that many doctors of the University were called to assist Cauchon in his examination of the Maid, and to bring her, witch, sorceress, heretic, whatever she might be, to question.  These doctors were not undistinguished or unworthy men.  A number of them held high office in the Church; almost all were honourably connected with the University, the source of learning in France.  “With what art were they chosen!” exclaims M. Blaze de Bury.  “A number of theologians, the elite of the time, had been named to represent France at the council of Bale; of these Cauchon chose the flower.”  This does not seem on the face of it to be a fact against, but rather in favour of, the tribunal, which the reader naturally supposes must have been the better, the more just, for being chosen among the flower of learning in France.  They were not men who could be imagined to be the tools of any Bishop.  Quicherat, in his moderate and able remarks on this subject, selects for special mention three men who took a very important part in it, Guillame Erard, Nicole Midi, and Tomas de Courcelles.  They were all men who held a high place in the respect of their generation.  Erard was a friend of Machet, the confessor of Charles VII., who had been a member of the tribunal at Poitiers which first pronounced upon the pretensions of Jeanne; yet after the trial of the Maid Machet still describes him as a man of the highest virtue and heavenly wisdom.  Nicole Midi continued to hold an honourable place in his University for many years, and was the man chosen to congratulate Charles when Paris finally became again the residence of the King.  Courcelles was considered the first theologian of the age.  “He was an austere and eloquent young man,” says Quicherat, “of a lucid mind, though nourished on abstractions.  He was the first of theologians long before he had attained the age at which he could assume the rank of doctor, and even before he had finished his studies he was considered as the successor of Gerson.  He was the light of the council of Bale.  Eneas Piccolomini (Pope Pius II.) speaks with admiration of his capacity and his modesty.  In him we recognise the father of the freedom of the Gallican Church.  His disinterestedness is shown by the simple position with which he contented himself.  He died with no higher rank than that of Dean of the Chapter of Paris.”