through which Italy was then passing, and in all of
which the singleness of purpose with which he continued
to advance his native Florence, is clearly manifested.
It was during his retirement upon his little estate
at San Casciano that Machiavelli wrote The Prince,
the most famous of all his writings, and here also
he had begun a much more extensive work, his Discourses
on the Decades of Livy, which continued to occupy
him for several years. These Discourses,
which do not form a continuous commentary on Livy,
give Machiavelli an opportunity to express his own
views on the government of the state, a task for which
his long and varied political experience, and an assiduous
study of the ancients rendered him eminently qualified.
The Discourses and The Prince, written
at the same time, supplement each other and are really
one work. Indeed, the treatise, The Art of
War, though not written till 1520 should be mentioned
here because of its intimate connection with these
two treatises, it being, in fact, a further development
of some of the thoughts expressed in the Discorsi.
The Prince, a short work, divided into twenty-six
books, is the best known of all Machiavelli’s
writings. Herein he expresses in his own masterly
way his views on the founding of a new state, taking
for his type and model Caesar Borgia, although the
latter had failed in his schemes for the consolidation
of his power in the Romagna. The principles here
laid down were the natural outgrowth of the confused
political conditions of his time. And as in the
Principe, as its name indicates, Machiavelli
is concerned chiefly with the government of a Prince,
so the Discorsi treat principally of the Republic,
and here Machiavelli’s model republic was the
Roman commonwealth, the most successful and most enduring
example of popular government. Free Rome is the
embodiment of his political idea of the state.
Much that Machiavelli says in this treatise is as true
to-day and holds as good as the day it was written.
And to us there is much that is of especial importance.
To select a chapter almost at random, let us take
Book I., Chap. XV.: “Public affairs
are easily managed in a city where the body of the
people is not corrupt; and where equality exists,
there no principality can be established; nor can a
republic be established where there is no equality.”
No man has been more harshly judged than Machiavelli, especially in the two centuries following his death. But he has since found many able champions and the tide has turned. The Prince has been termed a manual for tyrants, the effect of which has been most pernicious. But were Machiavelli’s doctrines really new? Did he discover them? He merely had the candor and courage to write down what everybody was thinking and what everybody knew. He merely gives us the impressions he had received from a long and intimate intercourse with princes and the affairs of state. It was Lord Bacon, I believe,