24/1 Fol. 128.

24/2 Cf. 1 Britton (Nich.), 6a, b, 16 (top paging 15, 39); Bract., fol. 136b; LL.  Alfred, c. 13 (1 Thorpe, Anc.  Laws, p. 71); Lex Saxon., Tit.  XIII.; Leg Alamann., Tit.  CIII. 24.

25/1 Fleta, I. 26, Section 10; Fitzh.  Abr.  Corone, pl. 416.  See generally Staundforde, P.C., I. c. 2, fol. 20 et seq.; 1 Hale, P.C. 410 et seq.

25/2 Doctor and Student, Dial. 2, c. 51.

25/3 Plowd. 260.

25/4 Jacob, Law Dict.  Deodand.

25/5 Y.B. 30 & 31 Ed. I., pp. 524, 525; cf.  Bract., fol. 136b.

26/1 Fitzh.  Abr.  Corone, pl. 403.

26/2 Bract. 122; 1 Britton (Nich.), top p. 16; Fleta, Ic. 25, Section 9, fol. 37.

26/3 1 Hale, P.C. 423.

26/4 1 Rot.  Parl. 372; 2 Rot.  Parl. 345, 372a, b; 3 Rot.  Parl. 94a, 120a, 121; 4 Rot.  Parl. 12a, b, 492b, 493.  But see 1 Hale, P.C. 423.

26/5 1 Black Book of the Admiralty, 242.

27/1 Cf.  Ticonderoga, Swabey, 215, 217.

27/2 China, 7 Wall. 53.

28/1 Doctor and Student, Dial. 2, c. 51.

28/2 1 Roll.  Abr. 530 (C) 1.

29/1 3 Black Book of Adm. 103.

29/2 Malek Adhel, 2 How. 210, 234.

30/1 3 Kent, 218; Customs of the Sea, cap. 27, 141, 182, in 3 Black Book of the Admiralty, 103, 243, 245.

31/1 3 Kent’s Comm. 188.

31/2 Clay v.  Snelgrave, 1 Ld.  Raym. 576, 577; S.C. 1 Salk. 33.  Cf.  Molloy, p. 355, Book II. ch. 3, Section 8.

31/3 “Ans perdront lurs loers quant la nef est perdue.” 2 Black Book, 213.  This is from the Judgments of the Sea, which, according to the editor (II., pp. xliv., xlvii.), is the most ancient extant source of modern maritime law except the decisions of Trani.  So Molloy, Book II. ch. 3, Section 7, p. 354:  “If the ship perishes at sea they lose their wages.”  So 1 Siderfin, 236, pl. 2.

32/1 3 Black Book, pp. lix., lxxiv.

32/2 3 Black Book, 263.  It should be added, however, that it is laid down in the same book that, if the vessel is detained in port by the local authorities, the master is not bound to give the mariners wages, “for he has earned no freight.”

32/3 Lipson v.  Harrison, 2 Weekly Rep. 10.  Cf.  Louisa Jane, 2 Lowell, 295.

32/4 3 Kent’s Comm. (12th ed.), 218; ib. 138, n. 1.

32/5 3 Kent, 218.

32/6 Justin v.  Ballam, 1 Salk. 34; S.C. 2 Ld.  Raym. 805.

33/1 D. 20. 4. 5 & 6; cf.  Livy, XXX. 38.

33/2 Pardessus, Droit.  Comm., n. 961.

33/3 3 Keb. 112, 114, citing 1 Roll.  Abr. 530.

34/1 Godbolt, 260.

34/2 3 Colquhoun, Roman Civil Law, Section 2196.

35/1 Lex Salica (Merkel), LXXVII.; Ed. Hilperich., Section 5.

36/1 See Lecture III., ad fin.

39/1 Cf. 2 Hawk.  P.C. 303 et seq.; 27 Ass. 25.

40/1 2 Palgrave, Commonwealth, cxxx., cxxxi.

41/1 Butler, Sermons, VIII.  Bentham, Theory of Legislation (Principles of Penal Code, Part 2, ch. 16), Hildreth’s tr., p. 309.