To the warrior, his life divided between fighting
and debauchery, his womenfolk tending the sick, helping
the weak, comforting the sorrowing, must have moved
with white feet across a world his vices had made
dark. Her mere subjection to the priesthood,
her inborn feminine delight in form and ceremony—now
an influence narrowing her charity—must
then, to his dim eyes, trained to look upon dogma
as the living soul of his religion, have seemed a
halo, deifying her. Woman was then the servant.
It was naturally to her advantage to excite tenderness
and mercy in man. Since she has become the mistress
of the world. It is no longer her interested
mission to soften his savage instincts. Nowadays,
it is the women who make war, the women who exalt
brute force. Today, it is the woman who, happy
herself, turns a deaf ear to the world’s low
cry of pain; holding that man honoured who would ignore
the good of the species to augment the comforts of
his own particular family; holding in despite as a
bad husband and father the man whose sense of duty
extends beyond the circle of the home. One recalls
Lady Nelson’s reproach to her lord after the
battle of the Nile. ’I have married a
wife, and therefore cannot come,’ is the answer
to his God that many a woman has prompted to her lover’s
tongue. I was speaking to a woman only the other
day about the cruelty of skinning seals alive.
‘I feel so sorry for the poor creatures,’
she murmured; ’but they say it gives so much
more depth of colour to the fur.’ Her
own jacket was certainly a very beautiful specimen.”
“When I was editing a paper,” I said,
“I opened my columns to a correspondence on
this very subject. Many letters were sent to
me— most of them trite, many of them foolish.
One, a genuine document, I remember. It came
from a girl who for six years had been assistant to
a fashionable dressmaker. She was rather tired
of the axiom that all women, at all times, are perfection.
She suggested that poets and novelists should take
service for a year in any large drapery or millinery
establishment where they would have an opportunity
of studying woman in her natural state, so to speak.”
“It is unfair to judge us by what, I confess,
is our chief weakness,” argued the Woman of
the World. “Woman in pursuit of clothes
ceases to be human—she reverts to the original
brute. Besides, dressmakers can be very trying.
The fault is not entirely on one side.”
“I still fail to be convinced,” remarked
the Girton Girl, “that woman is over-praised.
Not even the present conversation, so far as it has
gone, altogether proves your point.”