It is principally to the general baseness and profligacy of the times that Clarendon is indebted for his high reputation.  He was, in every respect, a man unfit for his age, at once too good for it and too bad for it.  He seemed to be one of the ministers of Elizabeth, transplanted at once to a state of society widely different from that in which the abilities of such ministers had been serviceable.  In the sixteenth century, the Royal prerogative had scarcely been called in question.  A Minister who held it high was in no danger, so long as he used it well.  That attachment to the Crown, that extreme jealousy of popular encroachments, that love, half religious half political, for the Church, which, from the beginning of the second session of the Long Parliament, showed itself in Clarendon, and which his sufferings, his long residence in France, and his high station in the government, served to strengthen, would a hundred years earlier, have secured to him the favour of his sovereign without rendering him odious to the people.  His probity, his correctness in private life, his decency of deportment, and his general ability, would not have misbecome a colleague of Walsingham and Burleigh.  But, in the times on which he was cast, his errors and his virtues were alike out of place.  He imprisoned men without trial.  He was accused of raising unlawful contributions on the people for the support of the army.  The abolition of the act which ensured the frequent holding of Parliaments was one of his favourite objects.  He seems to have meditated the revival of the Star-Chamber and the High Commission Court.  His zeal for the prerogative made him unpopular; but it could not secure to him the favour of a master far more desirous of ease and pleasure than of power.  Charles would rather have lived in exile and privacy, with abundance of money, a crowd of mimics to amuse him, and a score of mistresses, than have purchased the absolute dominion of the world by the privations and exertions to which Clarendon was constantly urging him.  A councillor who was always bringing him papers and giving him advice, and who stoutly refused to compliment Lady Castlemaine and to carry messages to Mistress Stewart, soon became more hateful to him than ever Cromwell had been.  Thus, considered by the people as an oppressor, by the Court as a censor, the Minister fell from his high office with a ruin more violent and destructive than could ever have been his fate, if he had either respected the principles of the Constitution or flattered the vices of the King.

Mr. Hallam has formed, we think, a most correct estimate of the character and administration of Clarendon.  But he scarcely makes a sufficient allowance for the wear and tear which honesty almost necessarily sustains in the friction of political life, and which, in times so rough as those through which Clarendon passed, must be very considerable.  When these are fairly estimated, we think that his integrity may be allowed