The ministers occupied an intermediate position; they proposed to declare that the legislative authority of the British Parliament over the whole Empire was in all cases supreme; and they proposed, at the same time, to repeal the Stamp Act.  To the former measure Pitt objected; but it was carried with scarcely a dissentient voice.  The repeal of the Stamp Act Pitt strongly supported; but against the Government was arrayed a formidable assemblage of opponents.  Grenville and the Bedfords were furious.  Temple, who had now allied himself closely with his brother, and separated himself from Pitt, was no despicable enemy.  This, however, was not the worst.  The ministry was without its natural strength.  It had to struggle, not only against its avowed enemies, but against the insidious hostility of the King, and of a set of persons who, about this time, began to be designated as the King’s friends.

The character of this faction has been drawn by Burke with even more than his usual force and vivacity.  Those who know how strongly, through his whole life, his judgment was biassed by his passions, may not unnaturally suspect that he has left us rather a caricature than a likeness; and yet there is scarcely, in the whole portrait, a single touch of which the fidelity is not proved by facts of unquestionable authenticity.

The public generally regarded the King’s friends as a body of which Bute was the directing soul.  It was to no purpose that the Earl professed to have done with politics, that he absented himself year after year from the levee and the drawing-room, that he went to the north, that he went to Rome.  The notion that, in some inexplicable manner, he dictated all the measures of the Court, was fixed in the minds, not only of the multitude, but of some who had good opportunities of obtaining information, and who ought to have been superior to vulgar prejudices.  Our own belief is that these suspicions were unfounded, and that he ceased to have any communication with the King on political matters some time before the dismissal of George Grenville.  The supposition of Bute’s influence is, indeed, by no means necessary to explain the phaenomena.  The King, in 1765, was no longer the ignorant and inexperienced boy who had, in 1760, been managed by his mother and his Groom of the Stole.  He had, during several years, observed the struggles of parties, and conferred daily on high questions of State with able and experienced politicians.  His way of life had developed his understanding and character.  He was now no longer a puppet, but had very decided opinions both of men and things.  Nothing could be more natural than that he should have high notions of his own prerogatives, should be impatient of opposition and should wish all public men to be detached from each other and dependent on himself alone; nor could anything be more natural than that, in the state in which the political world then was, he should find instruments fit for his purposes.