Such were the views of the Duke of Bedford and of the Earl of Hardwicke; but no member of the Government held these opinions so strongly as George Grenville, the treasurer of the navy.  George Grenville was brother-in-law of Pitt, and had always been reckoned one of Pitt’s personal and political friends.  But it is difficult to conceive two men of talents and integrity more utterly unlike each other, Pitt, as his sister often said, knew nothing accurately except Spenser’s Fairy Queen.  He had never applied himself steadily to any branch of knowledge.  He was a wretched financier.  He never became familiar even with the rules of that House of which he was the brightest ornament.  He had never studied public law as a system; and was, indeed, so ignorant of the whole subject, that George the Second, on one occasion, complained bitterly that a man who had never read Vattel should presume to undertake the direction of foreign affairs.  But these defects were more than redeemed by high and rare gifts, by a strange power of inspiring great masses of men with confidence and affection, by an eloquence which not only delighted the ear, but stirred the blood, and brought tears into the eyes, by originality in devising plans, by vigour in executing them.  Grenville, on the other hand, was by nature and habit a man of details.  He had been bred a lawyer; and he had brought the industry and acuteness of the Temple into official and parliamentary life.  He was supposed to be intimately acquainted with the whole fiscal system of the country.  He had paid especial attention to the law of Parliament, and was so learned in all things relating to the privileges and orders of the House of Commons that those who loved him least pronounced him the only person competent to succeed Onslow in the Chair.  His speeches were generally instructive, and sometimes, from the gravity and earnestness with which he spoke, even impressive, but never brilliant, and generally tedious.  Indeed, even when he was at the head of affairs, he sometimes found it difficult to obtain the ear of the House.  In disposition as well as in intellect, he differed widely from his brother-in-law.  Pitt was utterly regardless of money.  He would scarcely stretch out his hand to take it; and when it came, he threw it away with childish profusion.  Grenville, though strictly upright, was grasping and parsimonious.  Pitt was a man of excitable nerves, sanguine in hope, easily elated by success and popularity, keenly sensible of injury, but prompt to forgive; Grenville’s character was stem, melancholy, and pertinacious.  Nothing was more remarkable in him than his inclination always to look on the dark side of things.  He was the raven of the House of Commons, always croaking defeat in the midst of triumphs, and bankruptcy with an overflowing exchequer.  Burke, with general applause, compared him, in a time of quiet and plenty, to the evil spirit whom Ovid described looking down on the stately temples and wealthy haven of Athens, and scarce able to refrain from weeping because she could find nothing at which to weep.  Such a man was not likely to be popular.  But to unpopularity Grenville opposed a dogged determination, which sometimes forced even those who hated him to respect him.