To so conservative a frame of mind had the excesses of the French Revolution brought the most illustrious reformers of that time.  And why is one person to be singled out from among millions, and arraigned before posterity as a traitor to his opinions only because events produced on him the effect which they produced on a whole generation?  People who, like Mr. Brothers in the last generation, and Mr. Percival in this, have been favoured with revelations from heaven, may be quite independent of the vulgar sources of knowledge.  But such poor creatures as Mackintosh, Dumont, and Bentham, had nothing but observation and reason to guide them; and they obeyed the guidance of observation and of reason.  How is it in physics?  A traveller falls in with a berry which he has never before seen.  He tastes it, and finds it sweet and refreshing.  He praises it, and resolves to introduce it into his own country.  But in a few minutes he is taken violently sick; he is convulsed; he is at the point of death.  He of course changes his opinion, denounces this delicious food a poison, blames his own folly in tasting it, and cautions his friends against it.  After a long and violent struggle he recovers, and finds himself much exhausted by his sufferings, but free from some chronic complaints which had been the torment of his life.  He then changes his opinion again, and pronounces this fruit a very powerful remedy, which ought to be employed only in extreme cases and with great caution, but which ought not to be absolutely excluded from the Pharmacopoeia.  And would it not be the height of absurdity to call such a man fickle and inconsistent, because he had repeatedly altered his judgment?  If he had not altered his judgment, would he have been a rational being?  It was exactly the same with the French Revolution.  That event was a new phaenomenon in politics.  Nothing that had gone before enabled any person to judge with certainty of the course which affairs might take.  At first the effect was the reform of great abuses; and honest men rejoiced.  Then came commotion, proscription, confiscation, bankruptcy, the assignats, the maximum, civil war, foreign war, revolutionary tribunals, guillotinades, noyades, fusillades.  Yet a little while, and a military despotism rose out of the confusion, and menaced the independence of every state in Europe.

And yet again a little while, and the old dynasty returned, followed by a train of emigrants eager to restore the old abuses.  We have now, we think, the whole before us.  We should therefore be justly accused of levity or insincerity if our language concerning those events were constantly changing.  It is our deliberate opinion that the French Revolution, in spite of all its crimes and follies, was a great blessing to mankind.  But it was not only natural, but inevitable, that those who had only seen the first act should be ignorant of the catastrophe, and should be alternately elated and depressed as the plot went