[Footnote 751: Perrot et Chipiez, iv. 328.]
[Footnote 752: 1 Kings vii. 27-39.]
[Footnote 753: Ibid. verse 38.]
[Footnote 754: Ibid. verse 29.]
[Footnote 755: See the woodcut in Perrot et Chipiez, iv. 331, No. 173; and compare 1 Kings vii. 31.]
[Footnote 756: 1 Kings vii. 36.]
[Footnote 757: 1 Kings vii. 33.]
[Footnote 758: Ibid. v. 40. Compare 2 Chron. iv. 16.]
[Footnote 759: See Di Cesnola’s Cyprus, Pls. xxi. and xxx.]
[Footnote 760: A single statue in bronze, of full size, or larger than life, is said to have been exhumed in Cyprus in 1836 (Perrot et Chipiez, iii. 514); but it has not reached our day.]
[Footnote 761: See the works of La Marmora (Voyage en Sardaigne), Cara (Relazione sugli idoli sardo-fenici), and Perrot et Chipiez (Hist. de l’Art, iv. 65-89).]
[Footnote 762: Perrot et Chipiez, iv. 65, 66.]
[Footnote 763: Ibid. pp. 67, 69, 88.]
[Footnote 764: Ibid. pp. 67, 70, 89.]
[Footnote 765: Ibid. 52, 74, 75, 87, &c.]
[Footnote 766: See Di Cesnola, Cyprus, Pl. iv. opp. p. 84.]
[Footnote 767: Ibid. opp. p. 345.]
[Footnote 768: Ibid. p. 337.]
[Footnote 769: Monumenti di cere antica, Pl. x. fig. 1.]
[Footnote 770: Di Cesnola, Cyprus, p. 77.]
[Footnote 771: Di Cesnola, Cyprus, Pl. xi. opp. p. 114.]
[Footnote 772: In the museum of the Varvakeion. (See Perrot et Chipiez, Hist. de l’Art, iii. 782-785.)]
[Footnote 773: Ibid. p. 783, No. 550.]
[Footnote 774: Compare the author’s History of Ancient Egypt, i. 362.]
[Footnote 775: Perrot et Chipiez, iii. 779, No. 548.]
[Footnote 776: See Ancient Monarchies, i. 392.]
[Footnote 777: See Clermont-Ganneau, Imagerie Phenicienne, p. xiii.]
[Footnote 778: See Clermont-Ganneau, Ima. Phenicienne, Pls. ii. iv. and vi. Compare Longperier, Musee Napoleon III., Pl. x.; Di Cesnola, Cyprus, p. 329; Pl. xix. opp. p. 276; Perrot et Chipiez, Hist. de l’Art, iii. 777, 789; Nos. 547 and 552.]
[Footnote 779: Clermont-Ganneau, Pl. i. at end of volume; Perrot et Chipiez, iii. 759, No. 543.]
[Footnote 780: L’Imagerie Phenicienne, p. 8.]
[Footnote 781: Helbig, Bullettino dell’ Instituto di Corrispondenza archeologica, 1876, p. 127.]
[Footnote 782: L’Imagerie Phenicienne, p. 8.]
[Footnote 783: L’Imagerie Phenicienne, pp. xi, xiii, and 18-39.]
[Footnote 784: Ibid. p. 151.]
[Footnote 785: L’Imagerie Phenicienne, pp. 150-156. It is fatal to M. Clermont-Ganneau’s idea—1. That the hunter in the outer scene has no dog; 2. That the dress of the charioteer is wholly unlike that of the fugitive attacked by the dog; and 3. That M. Clermont-Ganneau’s explanation accounts in no way for the medallion’s central and main figure.]