that ’between the thicket and the river, the rails of the fences were found taken down, and the ground bore evident traces of some heavy burden having been dragged along it!’ But would a number of men have put themselves to the superfluous trouble of taking down a fence, for the purpose of dragging through it a corpse which they might have lifted over any fence in an instant?  Would a number of men have so dragged a corpse at all as to have left evident traces of the dragging?

“And here we must refer to an observation of Le Commerciel; an observation upon which I have already, in some measure, commented.  ’A piece,’ says this journal, ’of one of the unfortunate girl’s petticoats was torn out and tied under her chin, and around the back of her head, probably to prevent screams.  This was done by fellows who had no pocket-handkerchiefs.’

“I have before suggested that a genuine blackguard is never without a pocket-handkerchief.  But it is not to this fact that I now especially advert.  That it was not through want of a handkerchief for the purpose imagined by Le Commerciel, that this bandage was employed, is rendered apparent by the handkerchief left in the thicket; and that the object was not ‘to prevent screams’ appears, also, from the bandage having been employed in preference to what would so much better have answered the purpose.  But the language of the evidence speaks of the strip in question as ’found around the neck, fitting loosely, and secured with a hard knot.’  These words are sufficiently vague, but differ materially from those of Le Commerciel.  The slip was eighteen inches wide, and therefore, although of muslin, would form a strong band when folded or rumpled longitudinally.  And thus rumpled it was discovered.  My inference is this.  The solitary murderer, having borne the corpse, for some distance, (whether from the thicket or elsewhere) by means of the bandage hitched around its middle, found the weight, in this mode of procedure, too much for his strength.  He resolved to drag the burthen — the evidence goes to show that it was dragged.  With this object in view, it became necessary to attach something like a rope to one of the extremities.  It could be best attached about the neck, where the head would prevent its slipping off.  And, now, the murderer bethought him, unquestionably, of the bandage about the loins.  He would have used this, but for its volution about the corpse, the hitch which embarrassed it, and the reflection that it had not been ‘torn off’ from the garment.  It was easier to tear a new slip from the petticoat.  He tore it, made it fast about the neck, and so dragged his victim to the brink of the river.  That this ‘bandage,’ only attainable with trouble and delay, and but imperfectly answering its purpose — that this bandage was employed at all, demonstrates that the necessity for its employment sprang from circumstances arising at a period when the handkerchief was no longer attainable —­ that is to say, arising, as we have imagined, after quitting the thicket, (if the thicket it was), and on the road between the thicket and the river.