“An outrage of the most atrocious character was perpetrated near this city the day before yesterday.  A gentleman, with his wife and daughter, engaged, about dusk, the services of six young men, who were idly rowing a boat to and fro near the banks of the Seine, to convey him across the river.  Upon reaching the opposite shore, the three passengers stepped out, and had proceeded so far as to be beyond the view of the boat, when the daughter discovered that she had left in it her parasol.  She returned for it, was seized by the gang, carried out into the stream, gagged, brutally treated, and finally taken to the shore at a point not far from that at which she had originally entered the boat with her parents.  The villains have escaped for the time, but the police are upon their trail, and some of them will soon be taken.” — Morning Paper — June 25. {*19}

“We have received one or two communications, the object of which is to fasten the crime of the late atrocity upon Mennais; {*20} but as this gentleman has been fully exonerated by a loyal inquiry, and as the arguments of our several correspondents appear to be more zealous than profound, we do not think it advisable to make them public.” — Morning Paper — June 28. {*21}

“We have received several forcibly written communications, apparently from various sources, and which go far to render it a matter of certainty that the unfortunate Marie Rogêt has become a victim of one of the numerous bands of blackguards which infest the vicinity of the city upon Sunday.  Our own opinion is decidedly in favor of this supposition.  We shall endeavor to make room for some of these arguments hereafter.” — Evening Paper — Tuesday, June 31. {*22}

“On Monday, one of the bargemen connected with the revenue service, saw a empty boat floating down the Seine.  Sails were lying in the bottom of the boat.  The bargeman towed it under the barge office.  The next morning it was taken from thence, without the knowledge of any of the officers.  The rudder is now at the barge office.” — Le Diligence — Thursday, June 26. §

Upon reading these various extracts, they not only seemed to me irrelevant, but I could perceive no mode in which any one of them could be brought to bear upon the matter in hand.  I waited for some explanation from Dupin.

“It is not my present design,” he said, “to dwell upon the first and second of those extracts.  I have copied them chiefly to show you the extreme remissness of the police, who, as far as I can understand from the Prefect, have not troubled themselves, in any respect, with an examination of the naval officer alluded to.  Yet it is mere folly to say that between the first and second disappearance of Marie, there is no supposable connection.  Let us admit the first elopement to have resulted in a quarrel between the lovers, and the return home of the betrayed.  We are now prepared to view a second elopement (if we know that an elopement has