Meantime, the excitement increased hourly.  Several individuals were arrested and discharged.  St. Eustache fell especially under suspicion; and he failed, at first, to give an intelligible account of his whereabouts during the Sunday on which Marie left home.  Subsequently, however, he submitted to Monsieur G——­, affidavits, accounting satisfactorily for every hour of the day in question.  As time passed and no discovery ensued, a thousand contradictory rumors were circulated, and journalists busied themselves in suggestions.  Among these, the one which attracted the most notice, was the idea that Marie Rogêt still lived — that the corpse found in the Seine was that of some other unfortunate.  It will be proper that I submit to the reader some passages which embody the suggestion alluded to.  These passages are literal translations from L’Etoile, {*10} a paper conducted, in general, with much ability.

“Mademoiselle Rogêt left her mother’s house on Sunday morning, June the twenty-second, 18—­, with the ostensible purpose of going to see her aunt, or some other connexion, in the Rue des Drômes.  From that hour, nobody is proved to have seen her.  There is no trace or tidings of her at all. . . .  There has no person, whatever, come forward, so far, who saw her at all, on that day, after she left her mother’s door. . . .  Now, though we have no evidence that Marie Rogêt was in the land of the living after nine o’clock on Sunday, June the twenty-second, we have proof that, up to that hour, she was alive.  On Wednesday noon, at twelve, a female body was discovered afloat on the shore of the Barrière de Roule.  This was, even if we presume that Marie Rogêt was thrown into the river within three hours after she left her mother’s house, only three days from the time she left her home — three days to an hour.  But it is folly to suppose that the murder, if murder was committed on her body, could have been consummated soon enough to have enabled her murderers to throw the body into the river before midnight.  Those who are guilty of such horrid crimes, choose darkness rather the light . . . .  Thus we see that if the body found in the river was that of Marie Rogêt, it could only have been in the water two and a half days, or three at the outside.  All experience has shown that drowned bodies, or bodies thrown into the water immediately after death by violence, require from six to ten days for decomposition to take place to bring them to the top of the water.  Even where a cannon is fired over a corpse, and it rises before at least five or six days’ immersion, it sinks again, if let alone.  Now, we ask, what was there in this cave to cause a departure from the ordinary course of nature? . . .  If the body had been kept in its mangled state on shore until Tuesday night, some trace would be found on shore of the murderers.  It is a doubtful point, also, whether the body would be so soon afloat, even were it thrown in after having been dead two days.  And, furthermore, it is exceedingly improbable that any villains who had committed such a murder as is here supposed, would have throw the body in without weight to sink it, when such a precaution could have so easily been taken.”